2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale dependence of mineral dissolution rates within single pores and fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
171
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
171
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10, we used the geometric surface area for a 420 µm diameter calcite grain (in the middle of the range of the sieved grain size), with an additional surface roughness factor of 2.303 based on BET measurements of the initial calcite spar crystals. In the CrunchFlow calculations, all of the reacting surface area is considered to be present within a single spherical geometry grid cell of 0.1 µm thickness, as in the calculations presented in Li et al [2008]. The rest of the domain is solution only and mineral precipitation is not allowed.…”
Section: Reactive Transport Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10, we used the geometric surface area for a 420 µm diameter calcite grain (in the middle of the range of the sieved grain size), with an additional surface roughness factor of 2.303 based on BET measurements of the initial calcite spar crystals. In the CrunchFlow calculations, all of the reacting surface area is considered to be present within a single spherical geometry grid cell of 0.1 µm thickness, as in the calculations presented in Li et al [2008]. The rest of the domain is solution only and mineral precipitation is not allowed.…”
Section: Reactive Transport Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is highly likely that they do, as demonstrated by such studies as those of Li et al [2006]. Even at the single pore scale, gradients may develop under certain conditions, although Li et al [2008] demonstrated that for typical groundwater flow rates, gradients within single pores were unlikely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1. This type of quenched disorder in the reaction and diffusion properties may occur in heterogeneous geological media characterized by a spatial distribution of minerals and thus specific reactive surface, and porosity [7], which leads to scale effects in the reaction properties [23,24].…”
Section: A Stochastic Decay Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies of mineral dissolution kinetics (e.g., Hamilton et al 2001;Hellmann and Tisserand 2006;Yang and Steefel 2008;Pierce et al 2010) and of the related process of glass degradation (e.g., Strachan and Croak 2000;Advocet et al 2001;Wolf-Boenisch et al 2004;Pierce et al 2006;Cailleteau et al 2008) have provided data to show that there is a complex coupled feedback process that changes glass degradation from simple far-from equilibrium dissolution kinetics at the start to slower degradation controlled in part by diffusion processes in gel and secondary phase layer(s) in which the reaction solution has a modified composition near the surface (i.e., the reactive interface) of fresh glass (see Grambow 2006;Van Iseghem et al 2007). In these cases the compositional gradients of the solution need to be taken into account and evaluated on a smaller scale than the bulk solution (Li et al 2008) and the appropriate approach to developing models of this coupled reaction and transport system is in general a reactive transport methodology (e.g., Steefel et al 2005). This allows capture of both far-from equilibrium dissolution processes of the initial attack stage for glass as well as the evolved system with secondary phases, transport process limitations, locally modified solution composition, and changes to reactive interface surface areas.…”
Section: Current Understanding and Gap Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%