2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05217-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale-aware feature pyramid architecture for marine object detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, multiscale significant features and spatial semantic features are dynamically fused to recognize the target. For underwater weak targets with different interference, three sets of simulation experiments are designed in this section to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and compare it with FISHnet [30], SiamFPN [31], SA-FPN [32], and literature [33]. The algorithm evaluation criteria are mean average precision (mAP) and recognition time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, multiscale significant features and spatial semantic features are dynamically fused to recognize the target. For underwater weak targets with different interference, three sets of simulation experiments are designed in this section to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and compare it with FISHnet [30], SiamFPN [31], SA-FPN [32], and literature [33]. The algorithm evaluation criteria are mean average precision (mAP) and recognition time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is section evaluates the recognition performance of the proposed algorithm in conventional underwater images and compares it with FFBNet [23], SiamFPN [24], SA-FPN [25], and Faster R-CNN [26]. e recognition results are shown in Figure 4, and the recognition accuracy and recognition speed are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Conventional Underwater Image Recognition Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is section evaluates the performance of the proposed algorithm to recognize underwater blurred images and compares it with FFBNet [23], SiamFPN [24], SA-FPN [25], Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience and Faster R-CNN [26]. e recognition results are shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Underwater Blurred Image Recognition Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation indicators of the algorithm are mAP and time. First, we compare the methods proposed in this paper with advanced methods, such as SA-FPN [24], YOLOv4 [25], ViTDet [26], and UPDETR [27]. In each subsection, we analyze the experimental results, and the conclusions of the experiments provide a clear picture of the efficiency of the algorithm in this paper.…”
Section: Underwater Image Missing Feature Generation Modulementioning
confidence: 99%