2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00236.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale and the limitations of ontological debate: a commentary on Marston, Jones and Woodward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
133
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(52 reference statements)
2
133
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We utilize McAdam et. al's theoretical framework of contentious politics (2001) and its later conceptual extension by geographers (Leitner and Miller, 2007;Leitner et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2003) to justify the point of entry for our analysis. We employ statistical methodology drawn from social network analysis (SNA) (Wasserman and Faust, 1994) to understand what the role of users self-identifying with a place has on their communicative practices within these networks of contention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize McAdam et. al's theoretical framework of contentious politics (2001) and its later conceptual extension by geographers (Leitner and Miller, 2007;Leitner et al, 2008;Martin et al, 2003) to justify the point of entry for our analysis. We employ statistical methodology drawn from social network analysis (SNA) (Wasserman and Faust, 1994) to understand what the role of users self-identifying with a place has on their communicative practices within these networks of contention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Interestingly, Neil made a similar argument when critiquing Castells' and others' concepts of "spaces of flows" (Smith 1996). 8 Jones et al (2007) offer a reply to Leitner and Miller (2007) as well as to the other critics and sympathizers in Transactions' "scale debates".…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, current approaches to economic globalization have yet to sufficiently capture the complex evolving relationships between actors and the multiple 'spaces' that constitute them in a globalizing world economy. Geographical thought has for some time sought to question the simplistic territorial conceptions of scale (Marston et al 2005;Leitner and Miller 2007;Nicholls 2009) along with the idea that economic activity is 'contained' in places or territories (Yeung 1998;Bathelt and Glückler 2003;Dicken 2003). However, whilst recent debates about GPNs (Henderson et al 2002;Lim 2006;Pan 2009) or the 'embeddedness' of regional clusters (Hite 2003;Hess 2004) have begun to theorize the interrelationships between place, materiality, territory and the economy, ongoing economic interconnectedness requires a more radical reconfiguration of how the different dimensions to global economic space are conceptualized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%