2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale and conformal invariance in field theory: a physical counterexample

Abstract: In this note, we illustrate how the two-dimensional theory of elasticity provides a physical example of field theory displaying scale but not conformal invariance.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was first noted by Coleman and Jackiw [22] in d = 4. It was studied in detail in d = 2 by Riva and Cardy (RC) [23], who also observed that it has a Euclidean interpretation as the theory of elasticity.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was first noted by Coleman and Jackiw [22] in d = 4. It was studied in detail in d = 2 by Riva and Cardy (RC) [23], who also observed that it has a Euclidean interpretation as the theory of elasticity.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional derivative of the virial current with respect to φ 0 is an operator of dimension three and hence we can write its most general form 16) for some constants a k , b, c, where j µ k is a set of currents of dimension 3 including possibly V µ . This leads tô…”
Section: T T Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See e.g. [37][38] how the generic choices of the kinetic term break conformal invariance while preserving the scale invariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%