Scale-4 Analysis of Pressurized Water Reactor Critical Configurations: Volume 1-Summary

DeHart, Mark D.

doi:10.2172/814373

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…13 Furthermore, it can be shown that CRs with axiallyheterogeneous compositions can significantly reduce the axial shape index (ASI) compared with CRs with axiallyhomogeneous compositions, based on the principles of partial strength CR. 14 The disadvantages of R-BA and heterogeneous CRs are the highly complex design and fabrication process of fuel pins and CRs. One disadvantage of the absence of soluble boron is the increased use of BA to control the reactivity of the core, which increases the cost.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptual design of long‐cycle boron‐free small modular pressurized water reactor with control rod operation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary This paper presents a new conceptual design of soluble‐boron‐free small modular pressurized water reactor (SMPWR) core with the following singular features: long operation cycle, axially heterogeneous adjuster control rods, and ring‐type burnable absorbers (R‐BAs) coated on the outside of cladding materials. The core loads 37 Westinghouse‐type 17 × 17 fuel assemblies (FAs) of active fuel height 200 cm and produces 180 MW of nominal thermal power during a cycle length of 1555 effective full power days (EFPDs). Three types of burnable absorbers (BAs) are used to address the excess reactivity and obtain a long cycle: 2 w/o and 8 w/o enriched Gd2O3 integral‐type BA (IBA), natural gadolinium R‐BA, and 80 w/o enriched 10B Al2O3/B4C wet annular burnable absorber (WABA). Two types of 200 cm long axially heterogeneous adjuster control rods are used to control the reactivity and the offset in axial power distribution. The first rod type adopts HfB2 with 80 w/o enriched 10B for the bottom 140 cm and stainless steel for the top 60 cm. The second rod type uses HfB2 (natural boron) for the bottom 100 cm and HfB2 (80 w/o enriched 10B) for the top 100 cm. A detailed safety parameter analysis is conducted to verify the imposed design limits, namely, axial shape index of less than ±0.4, 3D power peaking factor of smaller than 5.09, required shutdown margin of greater than 3000 pcm, and negative isothermal temperature coefficient during the entire reactor operation. It is successfully demonstrated that the proposed novel SMPWR design satisfies all the design limits and the target cycle length of 1500 EFPDs.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%