Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2556195.2556229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable topic-specific influence analysis on microblogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alpha centrality [97] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) T -index [67] Ω(T + n) Information Diffusion [99] limited request Topic-Specific Author [70] limited request By effective audience [127] limited request TRank [90] limited request RetweetRank [147] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) MentionRank [147] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) TwitterRank [144] limited request InterRank [129] limited request Topic-Entity PageRank [16] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) TIURank [83] limited request ARI [54] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) Twitter user rank [95] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) TS-SRW [63] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) Topical Authority [57] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) IARank [17] Ω(T · k 2 ) SNI [53] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) By polarity & others [8] limited request By sucesptibility... [76] limited request By tweets graph [126] ? (high) WRA [152] limited request FLDA [5] ? (high) Leadership [2] ?…”
Section: Topical-sensitivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alpha centrality [97] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) T -index [67] Ω(T + n) Information Diffusion [99] limited request Topic-Specific Author [70] limited request By effective audience [127] limited request TRank [90] limited request RetweetRank [147] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) MentionRank [147] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) TwitterRank [144] limited request InterRank [129] limited request Topic-Entity PageRank [16] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) TIURank [83] limited request ARI [54] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) Twitter user rank [95] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) TS-SRW [63] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) Topical Authority [57] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) IARank [17] Ω(T · k 2 ) SNI [53] Ω(T + n 2.3727 ) By polarity & others [8] limited request By sucesptibility... [76] limited request By tweets graph [126] ? (high) WRA [152] limited request FLDA [5] ? (high) Leadership [2] ?…”
Section: Topical-sensitivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…API REST allows to read or write data on Twitter through simple HTTP primitives like GET and POST. 5 For instance, if a GET is performed to the "https://api.twitter.com/1.1/trends/place.json?id=1" resource, then the API will return 50 global trending topics. We show in Listing 1.1 an extract of the answer to the previous query.…”
Section: Api Restmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods mainly use the link structures among the users to indicate users' social influence, ignoring the rich features provided by micro-blogging services. To address these limitations of previous approaches, a model named Followship-LDA is proposed in [5]. This model integrates both content topic discovery and social influence analysis in the same generative process.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghosh et al in [7] try to infer topical experts by leveraging crowd-sourced information from Twitter Lists. A very recent study [2] integrates topic modeling and influence analysis in the same model. Their proposed method called FLDA, it is a more complex mixture model than LDA which integrates probability distributions over topics with influence scores.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%