2016
DOI: 10.1364/optica.3.000433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable performance in solid-state single-photon sources

Abstract: The desiderata for an ideal photon source are high brightness, high single-photon purity, and high indistinguishability. Defining brightness at the first collection lens, these properties have been simultaneously demonstrated with solid-state sources, however absolute source efficiencies remain close to the 1% level, and indistinguishability only demonstrated for photons emitted consecutively on the few nanosecond scale. Here we employ deterministic quantum dot-micropillar devices to demonstrate solid-state si… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
153
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, and in contrast to previous studies [31], this is done for strictly resonant s-shell excitation, as well as quasiresonant excitation with a QD-laser detuning of 34 meV, which is consistent with a p-shell resonance of the QD [26,50] For resonant s-shell excitation (blue circles), the x axis corresponds to the pump power as a fraction of a π pulse. For quasiresonant pshell excitation (red squares), we excite ≈34 meV above the s shell, with the x axis now corresponding to the fraction with respect to the saturation power.…”
Section: B Dependence On Excitation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Furthermore, and in contrast to previous studies [31], this is done for strictly resonant s-shell excitation, as well as quasiresonant excitation with a QD-laser detuning of 34 meV, which is consistent with a p-shell resonance of the QD [26,50] For resonant s-shell excitation (blue circles), the x axis corresponds to the pump power as a fraction of a π pulse. For quasiresonant pshell excitation (red squares), we excite ≈34 meV above the s shell, with the x axis now corresponding to the fraction with respect to the saturation power.…”
Section: B Dependence On Excitation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…They are the only candidate to practically interlink stationary quantum nodes to an extended network [4] and act as "flying qubits" [3,5]. In recent years, a variety of single photons sources were investigated, namely, down-conversion sources [6,7], single atoms or ions [3,8], quantum dots [9][10][11], and other single emitters [12]. The latter solid state sources hold the promise to be integrated into chip scale devices, to be free of multiphoton contamination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A destructive interference renders the probability that the photons are detected at opposite output ports (j1 a ; 1 b i) to zero, and therefore, between the two modes, a maximal negative correlation is observed. Such experiments with single emitters, aiming for all-optical quantum computation [1], have been performed in the past decade [8,20] and recently achieved near-unity values of jg ð1Þ ð0Þj 2 [9,10,21]. These remarkable results were enabled by their pulsed operation as a "single-photon gun," but this way of recording limits insights into the temporal properties of the photons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sources suffer from some of the same problems as atomic base sources, in that photons are not emitted with a well-defined wavevector. Similarly, quantum dots can be constructed within micro-cavities formed using Bragg mirrors, to preferentially emit photons into a useful direction and constrain the optical frequency [44] .…”
Section: Single Emitter Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%