2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2008.918153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Nonlinear FET Model Based on a Distributed Parasitic Network Description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The intrinsic portion of a standard two-finger test HEMT is extracted with a combination of an extended form of the EM extrinsic treatment in [3][4][5] for a single gate finger and the robust extraction technique of [6].…”
Section: Device Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The intrinsic portion of a standard two-finger test HEMT is extracted with a combination of an extended form of the EM extrinsic treatment in [3][4][5] for a single gate finger and the robust extraction technique of [6].…”
Section: Device Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ports 1 and 2 are the external measurement ports, while internal ports 3 to 4N+2 represent the differential gate-source and gate-drain ports of the intrinsic devices. In contrast to [3][4][5], the differential ports used here allow the impedance seen by all intrinsic device ports to vary according to the metal defining the manifold. This permits all the metal in the symmetric test device layout to be algebraically deembedded from measured s-parameters, immediately yielding the device parameters without any compaction, optimisation or iteration.…”
Section: Device Deconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination and subsequent de-embedding of the extrinsic elements is essential to access the performance of the intrinsic FET that is not directly measurable, since the intrinsic section of the FET is experimentally inaccessible. The extrinsic elements are usually determined using "cold" S-parameter measurements (V DS = 0 V, i.e., passive device) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], passive test structures [13][14][15][16][17], and full-wave electromagnetic simulations [18][19][20][21]. In practice, the "cold" approach is the most used, since it does not require additional dummy structures or detailed information about the FET layout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the computational expense, 'weakly-coupled' approaches have been defined where electromagnetic simulation results (through S-parameters), thermal models (through a thermal impedance matrix), and nonlinear electrothermal transistor models are coupled in the netlist of a circuit simulator. This provides a comprehensive description of the transistor for computationally efficient simulation [6]- [8], [12], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%