2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.10018
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Multi-Robot System for Non-myopic Spatial Sampling

Abstract: This paper presents a distributed scalable multirobot planning algorithm for non-uniform sampling of quasistatic spatial fields. We address the problem of efficient data collection using multiple autonomous vehicles. In this paper, we are interested in analysing the effect of communication between multiple robots, acting independently, on the overall sampling performance of the team. Our focus is on distributed sampling problem where the robots are operating independent of their teammates, but have the ability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig. 3, we compare MARLAS with multiple baseline sampling methods including independently trained multi-robot sampler [19], DARP (Divide Area based on the Robot's initial Positions) algorithm [15], and maxima search algorithm [22]. We used discounted accumulated reward and average pair-wise overlap metrics for these comparisons.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Fig. 3, we compare MARLAS with multiple baseline sampling methods including independently trained multi-robot sampler [19], DARP (Divide Area based on the Robot's initial Positions) algorithm [15], and maxima search algorithm [22]. We used discounted accumulated reward and average pair-wise overlap metrics for these comparisons.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [3,19], we proposed and evaluated various feature aggregation methods for adaptive sampling. Multiresolution feature aggregation [3] has been empirically proven to outperform other methods, as it reduces the state dimension and utilizes the geometry induced bias for the sampling task.…”
Section: Spatial Feature Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%