1995
DOI: 10.2307/1942031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable Decision Rules for Environmental Impact Studies: Effect Size, Type I, and Type II Errors

Abstract: Assessments of environmental impacts are being subject to greater scientific and legal scrutiny than ever before. The application of traditional statistical decision‐making criteria to questions of environmental impacts has become increasingly inadequate as society demands greater environmental accountability from economic development. In particular, impact assessment has inherited a preoccupation with Type I error rates that has pervaded ecological research, even though Type II errors are often equally severe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
210
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
210
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gray, 1996) so where effects were significant at P , 0.10 this is also indicated (e.g. Mapstone, 1995).…”
Section: Statistical Analyses Of Sampling Datamentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Gray, 1996) so where effects were significant at P , 0.10 this is also indicated (e.g. Mapstone, 1995).…”
Section: Statistical Analyses Of Sampling Datamentioning
confidence: 61%
“…That being said, power increases with sample size. Other carnivore studies have used monitoring criteria of a = b = 0.2 (Barlow et al, 2008), which assumes equal economic, social, political and environmental costs of Type I and II errors (Mapstone, 1995). Using these criteria, annual effort of 12 replicates at each of a simple random sample of P65 sites would offer sufficient power to detect a 50% decline in brown hyaena occupancy in our study area over a 5 year period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To protect against Type II error, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons (Quinn and Keough, 2002;Moran, 2003). Likewise, because the cost of making Type II errors is high, particularly when dealing with management practices that may adversely affect populations, results with 0.10 $ P $ 0.05 were considered marginally significant (Cousens and Marshall, 1987;Mapstone, 1995;Quinn and Keough, 2002).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%