2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.79.032322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalability of Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger and random-state entanglement in the presence of decoherence

Abstract: We derive analytical upper bounds for the entanglement of generalized Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states coupled to locally depolarizing and dephasing environments, and for local thermal baths of arbitrary temperature. These bounds apply for any convex quantifier of entanglement, and exponential entanglement decay with the number of constituent particles is found. The bounds are tight for depolarizing and dephasing channels. We also show that randomly generated initial states tend to violate these bounds, and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in the main part of the paper, a previously studied set of states with an X shaped density matrix is the generalized GHZ-diagonal states [15]. In this Appendix I prove that generalized GHZ-diagonal states do not include all possible X-states by constructing an explicit state with an X-shaped density matrix that is not part of the aforementioned set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned in the main part of the paper, a previously studied set of states with an X shaped density matrix is the generalized GHZ-diagonal states [15]. In this Appendix I prove that generalized GHZ-diagonal states do not include all possible X-states by constructing an explicit state with an X-shaped density matrix that is not part of the aforementioned set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This demonstrates that the entanglement of an X-state is either tri-partite or biseparable but not completely separable. Before calculating any specific entanglement metric and studying its decay in a given decohering environment, we note that an upper bound on the entanglement decay was derived in [15] for a number of different decohering environments. Though these bounds were calculated for the more limited generalized GHZ-diagonal states they appear to be appropriate to the states studied in this work.…”
Section: X-state Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is thus important to make both classifications of entangled states: into admitting and not admitting local realistic models, and into violating and not violating a given Bell inequality. Entanglement and Bell violation of different noisy states has already been studied by several authors [20][21][22][23][24]. All this indicates that entanglement and impossibility of a local hidden variable model are not only different concepts, but also truly different resources [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite-time disentanglement, sometimes referred to as "entanglement sudden death" [116,149], has been experimentally demonstrated [158,159,161,162]. Moreover, the entanglement of important classes of multipartite states exhibit, for a fixed time, an exponential decay with the number of parties [107,143,167], which contributes to the concerns regarding the viability of large-scale quantum information processing. For the case of collective decoherence, however, it is possible to construct decoherence-free subspaces of entangled states immune to the noise [168,169].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%