2017
DOI: 10.18489/sacj.v29i3.405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalability of DL_POLY on High Performance Computing Platform

Abstract: This paper presents a case study on the scalability of several versions of the molecular dynamics code (DL_POLY) performed on South Africa‘s Centre for High Performance Computing e1350 IBM Linux cluster, Sun system and Lengau supercomputers. Within this study different problem sizes were designed and the same chosen systems were employed in order to test the performance of DL_POLY using weak and strong scalability. It was found that the speed-up results for the small systems were better than large syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason that DL_FFLUX scales worse than DL_POLY in the L ′ = 0 case is once again due to the redundant work when predicting point charges. Note that the scalability of the MPI in various versions of DL_POLY has been tested extensively in the past. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason that DL_FFLUX scales worse than DL_POLY in the L ′ = 0 case is once again due to the redundant work when predicting point charges. Note that the scalability of the MPI in various versions of DL_POLY has been tested extensively in the past. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the scalability of the MPI in various versions of DL_POLY has been tested extensively in the past. 56,57 Profiling also gives us some insight into the percentage of the total runtime spent in DL_FFLUX and DL_POLY routines (as well as MPI-specific routines), which is presented in Figure 16 as pie charts. For the sake of clarity, just the profiles for N p = 1, 8, and 36 are shown; the rest of the pie charts appear in Figure S9 as well as a more detailed "sample" breakdown in Figure S10 showing the relative timings of the top 5 most costly subroutines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work relating to the benchmarking of molecular dynamics simulations to assess the performance of various popular MD software programmes, including DL_POLY, can be found in references [51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Dl_poly 3 and Dl_polymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason that DL_FFLUX scales worse than DL_POLY in the L'=0 case is once again due to the redundant work when predicting point charges. Note that the scalability of the MPI in various versions of DL_POLY has been tested extensively in the past55,56 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%