2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-013-0753-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalability and Performance Evaluation of Semantic Web Databases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuseki SPARQL Server performs very well in most of the triplestore related operations (Butt and Khan, 2014 ), although it suffers from write performance problems (Kilintzis and Beredimas, 2014 ). The reasoning step can be tuned and adapted to use different OWL profiles to reduce execution time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuseki SPARQL Server performs very well in most of the triplestore related operations (Butt and Khan, 2014 ), although it suffers from write performance problems (Kilintzis and Beredimas, 2014 ). The reasoning step can be tuned and adapted to use different OWL profiles to reduce execution time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPARQL (Karim et al. ; Butt and Khan ) is a graph‐matching query language. Each SPARQL query consists of a set of triple patterns that is inherently a graph pattern.…”
Section: Concepts and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data, stored in RDF format, can be retrieved and manipulated by the Semantic Web query lan-guage (SPARQL). SPARQL (Karim et al 2015;Butt and Khan 2014) is a graph-matching query language. Each SPARQL query consists of a set of triple patterns that is inherently a graph pattern.…”
Section: Semantic Web Query Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SWR techniques generally consider one of three storage structures: (1) Native Storage: SWR approaches [22,20] deploy persistent storage with their own designed storage architecture and are generally considered to be more efficient than the ones relying on relational databases [9]. (2) NoSQL Databases: Some of the SWR techniques use NoSQL databases to increase processing power and storage.…”
Section: Storagementioning
confidence: 99%