2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium 2014
DOI: 10.1109/pacificvis.2014.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ScagExplorer: Exploring Scatterplots by Their Scagnostics

Abstract: A scatterplot displays a relation between a pair of variables. Given a set of v variables, there are v(v − 1)/2 pairs of variables, and thus the same number of possible pairwise scatterplots. Therefore for even small sets of variables, the number of scatterplots can be large. Scatterplot matrices (SPLOMs) can easily run out of pixels when presenting high-dimensional data. We introduce a theoretical method and a testbed for assessing whether our method can be used to guide interactive exploration of high-dimens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A body of related work proposed techniques for sub-tasks in interactive visualization recommendation systems, such as improving expressiveness or perceptual effectiveness [24], matching user intents [10], displaying trends and outliers [20], etc. These sub-tasks can generally be divided into two categories [18,42]: whether the solution focuses on recommending data (what data to visualize), such as Discovery-driven Data Cubes [33], Scagnostics [39], Auto-Vis [40], AutoPartition [2], Foresight [6], SpotLight [11], ScagExplorer [5], VisPilot [19], VizDeck [28] and MuVE [9] or recommending encoding (how to design and visually encode the data), such as APT [24], ShowMe [25], BDVR [10], SeeDB [38], Draco-learn [26], and LQ 2 [44]. While some of those are ML-based [14,19,26,28], none recommends entire visualizations, and thus does not solve the visualization recommendation problem that lies at the heart of our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A body of related work proposed techniques for sub-tasks in interactive visualization recommendation systems, such as improving expressiveness or perceptual effectiveness [24], matching user intents [10], displaying trends and outliers [20], etc. These sub-tasks can generally be divided into two categories [18,42]: whether the solution focuses on recommending data (what data to visualize), such as Discovery-driven Data Cubes [33], Scagnostics [39], Auto-Vis [40], AutoPartition [2], Foresight [6], SpotLight [11], ScagExplorer [5], VisPilot [19], VizDeck [28] and MuVE [9] or recommending encoding (how to design and visually encode the data), such as APT [24], ShowMe [25], BDVR [10], SeeDB [38], Draco-learn [26], and LQ 2 [44]. While some of those are ML-based [14,19,26,28], none recommends entire visualizations, and thus does not solve the visualization recommendation problem that lies at the heart of our work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the existing rule-based [Hu et al 2018;Perry et al 2013;Vartak et al 2017;Wongsuphasawat et al 2015Wongsuphasawat et al , 2017, hybrid [Moritz et al 2018], and pure ML-based visualization recommendation [Qian et al 2020] approaches are unable to recommend personalized visualizations for specific users. These approaches do not model users, but focus entirely on learning or manually defining visualization rules that capture the notion of an effective visualization [Cui et al 2019;Dang and Wilkinson 2014;Demiralp et al 2017;Elzen and Wijk 2013;Key et al 2012;Lee et al 2019a;Mackinlay et al 2007b;Siddiqui et al 2016;Vartak et al 2015;Wilkinson and Wills 2008;Wills and Wilkinson 2010]. Therefore, no matter the user, the model always gives the same recommendations.…”
Section: Visualization Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By scagnostics, it is possible to detect anomalies in the dataset through indices calculated over the visualization of big scatterplot matrices. For example, Dang and Wilkinson 19 worked with scagnostics to find anomalies and similar distribution among the scatterplots of a scatterplot matrix with more than 100 dimensions. However, scagnostics are focused on extraction and deduction of information about a dataset from a visualization, but not on the quantification of the characteristics of the visualization itself.…”
Section: Metrics For Scatterplotsmentioning
confidence: 99%