2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0107-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffolding support through integration of learning material

Abstract: The ever-growing amount of learning material poses a challenge to both learners and teachers. In order to perform a learning task, students often need to search for additional information. Inquiry might be hampered if they do not know what exactly to search for, especially if they lack prior knowledge in a domain. Furthermore, they might need to recall meta-information, e.g., the implicit links between learning resources or the location of an explanation within a document. In addition, their performance in a l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inability of learners to solve problems and achieve desired learning outcomes led to the discovery of a pedagogical gap [80]. Material scaffolding depending on the learners' different developmental level is essential to bridge the gap at this level [81]. Plays for the tertiary level have optimal level of difficulty, challenges, and uncertain goal attainment [82].…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability of learners to solve problems and achieve desired learning outcomes led to the discovery of a pedagogical gap [80]. Material scaffolding depending on the learners' different developmental level is essential to bridge the gap at this level [81]. Plays for the tertiary level have optimal level of difficulty, challenges, and uncertain goal attainment [82].…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical studies have indicated a positive relationship between groups' immediate uptake to scaffoldings and the groups' collaborative experiences or performances. For example, Grévisse et al (2019) used a scaffolding platform to help students integrate relevant materials in a programming environment and examined the effect of the scaffolding. The results showed that compared to the traditional learning process, students actively used scaffolding to increase participation in collaborative programming and highly appraised the scaffolding.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the instructor scaffoldings lead to different effects regarding the immediate uptake (the group completes the ongoing task) and delayed use (the group solves problems after the scaffolding is faded) in CSCL (Barron, 2003;Wittwer & Renkl, 2008). After reviewing literature, we find a lack of mature standard to evaluate the immediate and delayed effect of instructor scaffoldings on collaborative programming (Grévisse et al, 2019;Zheng et al, 2022). Moreover, most previous research have collected and analyzed a single data source (e.g., discourses) to understand the process of collaboration (e.g., van de Pol et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This progression places increasing responsibility upon the student to take ownership of learning to solve problems while scaffolding provides an appropriate support structure, with the goal of increasing independence in learning (Greening, 1998). Scaffolding also helps learners achieve success beyond their own existing abilities, which is particularly important in subjects where they have no previous experience (Grévisse et al, 2019). Participants in the course were able to access the Jupyter Notebooks in their own time after the class to help facilitate the learning process both through review and additional experimentation.…”
Section: Session Designmentioning
confidence: 99%