2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffolding Chinese as a second language writing through a Systemic Functional Linguistics approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then codes from different data sources, interviews, and the collected artifacts, were compared within and across different cases to converge into themes through the recursive process of shuttling between the collected data and existing literature. For example, drawing upon the existing studies about teachers’ use of GBA (e.g., Gebhard et al, 2013 ; Tardy, 2017 ; Cheng and Chiu, 2018 ; Worden, 2018a , b , 2019 ; Li et al, 2020 ; Kindenberg, 2021 ), the codes “translating to L1,” “using mind maps” were categorized into the theme of strategies for scaffolding, together with the other two themes: the strategies to facilitate collaboration and strategies of localization. In the fourth stage, the themes were inductively grouped into three major categories, corresponding to the research focus of teachers’ understanding of GBA (i.e., knowledge), implementation of GBA in teaching writing (practices), and the perceived constraints on their GBWI practices (challenges).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then codes from different data sources, interviews, and the collected artifacts, were compared within and across different cases to converge into themes through the recursive process of shuttling between the collected data and existing literature. For example, drawing upon the existing studies about teachers’ use of GBA (e.g., Gebhard et al, 2013 ; Tardy, 2017 ; Cheng and Chiu, 2018 ; Worden, 2018a , b , 2019 ; Li et al, 2020 ; Kindenberg, 2021 ), the codes “translating to L1,” “using mind maps” were categorized into the theme of strategies for scaffolding, together with the other two themes: the strategies to facilitate collaboration and strategies of localization. In the fourth stage, the themes were inductively grouped into three major categories, corresponding to the research focus of teachers’ understanding of GBA (i.e., knowledge), implementation of GBA in teaching writing (practices), and the perceived constraints on their GBWI practices (challenges).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 20 years, the significance of genre-based approach (GBA) has gained traction in scholarship related to the second and foreign language writing pedagogies ( Troyan, 2016 ; Cheng and Chiu, 2018 ; Accurso and Gebhard, 2021 ; Kindenberg, 2021 ; Troyan et al, 2022 ). Though the discussion of genre traditions varies in terms of three schools, Systemic Functional Linguistics, English for Specific Purposes, and North American New Rhetoric ( Hyon, 1996 ), scholars generally agree on defining it as a “socially recognized way of using language in response to the reoccurring communicative situations” ( Worden, 2019 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the related developments of a hardware system, the rising appropriateness of language learners has been described for the effects of learning. Cheng and Chiu (2018) presented a case study that focused on the improvements made during a lesson unit on descriptive writing. The study results showed that two pre-intermediate level writers described increased control in the usage of interpersonal, conceptual, and textual resources related to the descriptive genre.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many other scholars in world language education have investigated SFL pedagogies in a variety of world languages to gauge their potential to develop students' abilities to communicate in various modes and genres. Examples include written (Yasuda, 2011) and spoken (Herazo, 2014) texts in English as a foreign language, spoken texts in Italian (Fernandez, 2017), written recounts in Arabic (Abdel-Malek, 2019), and descriptions in Chinese (Cheng & Chiu, 2018), Japanese (Kawamitsu, 2015), and Spanish (Troyan, 2014(Troyan, , 2016. Together, this expanding body of work in world language education highlights the potential of SFL and genre pedagogies to enable world language teachers to better support students' developing ability to communicate first in strings of related sentences and then in fully connected discourse in the target language across a variety of specific spoken and written genres and for a variety of purposes.…”
Section: Sfl and Genre In World Language Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many other scholars in world language education have investigated SFL pedagogies in a variety of world languages to gauge their potential to develop students’ abilities to communicate in various modes and genres. Examples include written (Yasuda, ) and spoken (Herazo, ) texts in English as a foreign language, spoken texts in Italian (Fernandez, ), written recounts in Arabic (Abdel‐Malek, ), and descriptions in Chinese (Cheng & Chiu, ), Japanese (Kawamitsu, ), and Spanish (Troyan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%