2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffolded reaching experiences encourage grasping activity in infants at high risk for autism

Abstract: Recent findings suggest impaired motor skill development during infancy in children later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). However, it remains unclear whether infants at high familial risk for ASD would benefit from early interventions targeting the motor domain. The current study investigated this issue by providing 3-month-old infants at high familial risk for ASD with training experiences aimed at facilitating independent reaching. A group of 17 high-risk (HR) infants received 2 weeks of scaf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular interest to our current findings, reduced grasping activity has been observed in 6‐month‐old infants at high risk for ASD (Libertus, Sheperd, Ross & Landa, ) and delays in motor skill development seem to increase with age in this population (Landa & Garrett‐Mayer, ; Lloyd, MacDonald & Lord, ). The long‐term benefits of motor training reported here suggest that infants at high risk for developing ASD and other disorders may benefit from motor training (Libertus & Landa, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest to our current findings, reduced grasping activity has been observed in 6‐month‐old infants at high risk for ASD (Libertus, Sheperd, Ross & Landa, ) and delays in motor skill development seem to increase with age in this population (Landa & Garrett‐Mayer, ; Lloyd, MacDonald & Lord, ). The long‐term benefits of motor training reported here suggest that infants at high risk for developing ASD and other disorders may benefit from motor training (Libertus & Landa, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, previous studies show that two weeks of parent-guided active mittens training positively influences infants' reaching and grasping behaviors (Libertus & Needham, 2010; Libertus & Landa, 2014), their object exploration (Needham et al, 2002), and even their social orienting behaviors (Libertus & Needham, 2011). Further research has determined that the different components of the sticky mittens experience—being encouraged to reach for the toy, planning to bring their hand toward the toy, obtaining the toy, and controlling the toy once obtained are all important components of the active mittens experience (Libertus & Needham, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These findings also address questions regarding the characteristics of sticky mittens experience that lead to increases in object exploration. In contrast to Needham et al (2002), Libertus & Needham (2010, 2011, 2014), and Libertus & Landa (2014), the current study involved only one short (10 minute) experimenter-guided training session. Thus, we had complete experimental control over the infants' experiences with the sticky mittens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, with repeated exposure to object retrieval tasks from 6.5 months of age, TD infants were able to successfully retrieve objects from boxes 1.5–2.5 months prior to control infants (Bojczyk & Corbetta, ). Similarly, two weeks of scaffolded reaching experiences using “sticky mittens” in 3‐month‐old AR infants led to advancements in their grasping skills (Libertus & Landa, ). Repeated active experiences with means‐end tasks may also facilitate infants’ understanding of the goal‐directed nature of means‐end and more generally tool use tasks performed by self and others (Gerson, Bekkering, & Hunnius, ; Rat‐Fischer, O'Regan, & Fagard, ; Sommerville & Woodward, ; Sommerville, Hildebrand, & Crane, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%