2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffold microstructure effects on functional and mechanical performance: Integration of theoretical and experimental approaches for bone tissue engineering applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9,10] This last group of techniques is commonly known as additive manufacturing (AM) and includes stereolithography, fused deposition modeling (FDM), 3D inkjet printing, and selective laser sintering; the precise control over scaffold porosity, pore size, and interconnectivity obtained with AM techniques has shown a great influence on cellular behavior, leading to promising results in terms of tissue regeneration. [11][12][13][14] Moving from 2D to 3D cultures has required a considerable effort in adapting the protocols used in 2D in order to understand more about how the 3D cell culture model affects cellular behavior and to allow direct comparison of the results. [15][16][17] In many cases, real-time monitoring methods have been developed by integrating biosensors into bioreactor systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10] This last group of techniques is commonly known as additive manufacturing (AM) and includes stereolithography, fused deposition modeling (FDM), 3D inkjet printing, and selective laser sintering; the precise control over scaffold porosity, pore size, and interconnectivity obtained with AM techniques has shown a great influence on cellular behavior, leading to promising results in terms of tissue regeneration. [11][12][13][14] Moving from 2D to 3D cultures has required a considerable effort in adapting the protocols used in 2D in order to understand more about how the 3D cell culture model affects cellular behavior and to allow direct comparison of the results. [15][16][17] In many cases, real-time monitoring methods have been developed by integrating biosensors into bioreactor systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collagen coating [147] -Cells show excellent adhesion to dense parts of the PLA Ability to attract cells to the outer surface of the scaffolds SDF-1 collagen coating [148] -Various cell types can grow, spread, and proliferate on PLA-printed scaffolds (as shown in Figure 17)…”
Section: Coating Physical Property Change Results Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[151] Nowadays, scaffold formation is typically made from materials selected by stacking struts on top of each other to achieve the final 3D object. [143,145,147,148] Many of the parameters associated with these struts and resulting meshes can vary, such as the diameter of the struts, the space between them, and the orientation from one layer to another. The macroscopic morphology of the PLA surface can even affect the orientation and morphology of the cells: the grooves of the wavy scaffold significantly induce cell elongation and change the morphology of the nucleus, whereas the cells grown on the porous scaffold are flatter and curved.…”
Section: Support For Induction Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new discipline aims to create biocompatible and biomimetic artificial structures to carry out the cellular regeneration of damaged bone tissue until the complete restoration of its functionality. For the creation of such osteogenic implants, the combination of three-dimensional scaffolds or matrices and bioactive molecules is necessary [4]. The strategy to follow to obtain this type of implants consists of extracting autologous bone tissue from a healthy area of the patient through a biopsy, from which cells that are introduced into the three-dimensional matrix are subsequently extracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%