2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffold microarchitecture determines internal bone directional growth structure: A numerical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3D printed scaffolds can be customized to fit complex anatomic skeletal defects . More importantly, some 3D printing processes allow for precise control of biologic and biomechanical properties of the scaffold through variations in mineral composition and structure . The ideal scaffold should be non‐toxic, biocompatible, possess adequate mechanical properties to withstand shear and axial force, and has porosity that favors bone ingrowth and vascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3D printed scaffolds can be customized to fit complex anatomic skeletal defects . More importantly, some 3D printing processes allow for precise control of biologic and biomechanical properties of the scaffold through variations in mineral composition and structure . The ideal scaffold should be non‐toxic, biocompatible, possess adequate mechanical properties to withstand shear and axial force, and has porosity that favors bone ingrowth and vascularization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 More importantly, some 3D printing processes allow for precise control of biologic and biomechanical properties of the scaffold through variations in mineral composition and structure. 13 The ideal scaffold should be non-toxic, biocompatible, possess adequate mechanical properties to withstand shear and axial force, and has porosity that favors bone ingrowth and vascularization. However, most scaffolding materials may not lead to a significant bone healing response, and combination with an osteoinductive stimulus may be required for optimal regeneration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microstructure and also mechanical properties are affected by the process parameters [42,43] as well as by the thermal after-treatment [44,45] of structures. In the evaluation of open-porous structures, strut orientation and loading angles [24,[46][47][48] as well as the functional correlation between porosity and elastic modulus [19] play a critical role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,86 There is still limited knowledge on how microstructure features (e.g., pore size distribution, pore orientation, interconnectivity, geometry of struts, and morphology and distribution of the BG coating or filler) affect the functional performance (e.g., angiogenesis) and mechanical response of a scaffold. 44,68,88,89 In the current study, it cannot be ruled out that coating with n-BG particles reduced pore interconnectivity and pore size. On the one hand, the reduction of pore size might have overcome and counteracted possible proangiogenic effects of n-BG, resulting in similar extents of neovascularization and tissue ingrowth for coated and uncoated scaffolds.…”
Section: In Vivo Analysis Of Neovascularization In N-bg-coated Decellmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Thus, a “dimension response element” has been suggested to be involved in the mechanisms of angiogenesis and regulation of angiogenic gene expression 44, 86. There is still limited knowledge on how microstructure features (e.g., pore size distribution, pore orientation, interconnectivity, geometry of struts, and morphology and distribution of the BG coating or filler) affect the functional performance (e.g., angiogenesis) and mechanical response of a scaffold 44, 68, 88, 89. In the current study, it cannot be ruled out that coating with n‐BG particles reduced pore interconnectivity and pore size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%