2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9bm01829h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffold channel size influences stem cell differentiation pathway in 3-D printed silica hybrid scaffolds for cartilage regeneration

Abstract: We report that 3-D printed scaffold channel size can direct bone marrow derived stem cell differentiation, e.g. ∼200–250 μm channels promote hyaline-like cartilage matrix production.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, a w/w ratio of 25:75 (inorganic:organic) was utilised. The ink was 3D printed using robocasting to produce scaffolds with strut diameters of 140–200 µm, vertical channel size of 200–250 µm [ 25 ] and modal interconnect size of 130 ± 10 µm [ 24 ]. The localised strain mechanics were considered for implants of two sizes: cubic “Mech” implants of 5.5 mm edge length typically used for materials testing ( n = 2, Figure 1 a) and cylindrical “Imp” implants of dimensions similar to the intended tissue engineering application for use in animal models during device development: 5 mm diameter and 1.2 mm height ( n = 4, Figure 1 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this study, a w/w ratio of 25:75 (inorganic:organic) was utilised. The ink was 3D printed using robocasting to produce scaffolds with strut diameters of 140–200 µm, vertical channel size of 200–250 µm [ 25 ] and modal interconnect size of 130 ± 10 µm [ 24 ]. The localised strain mechanics were considered for implants of two sizes: cubic “Mech” implants of 5.5 mm edge length typically used for materials testing ( n = 2, Figure 1 a) and cylindrical “Imp” implants of dimensions similar to the intended tissue engineering application for use in animal models during device development: 5 mm diameter and 1.2 mm height ( n = 4, Figure 1 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we implemented laboratory micro-CT and DVC to develop a mechanical testing methodology to evaluate 3D performance of low-stiffness degradable scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration. We chose 3D-printed inorganic sol-gel hybrids for this study due to their ability to take cyclic load, their fully degradable nature, their tailorable mechanical properties, which are similar to that of the articular cartilage tissue [ 24 ] and evidence that, when printed with pore channel sizes of 200–250 µm, human mesenchymal stem cells were sent down a chondrogenic lineage and stimulated to produce articular-like cartilage matrix in vitro [ 25 ]. These sol-gel hybrids therefore make an ideal implant choice to test the capabilities of DVC for regenerative medicine applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was carried out following six weeks of implantation within an ovine model, a typical study length and model choice for articular cartilage device research [ 23 ]. The 3D printed hybrid scaffold implant was specifically chosen as the implanted regenerative medicine device because of its ability to take cyclic load, tailorable mechanical properties which in this instance were similar to that of the articular cartilage tissue [ 24 ], the fully-degradable nature over a period of months and evidence that, when printed with pore channel sizes of 200–250 µm, human mesenchymal stem cells were sent down a chondrogenic lineage and stimulated to produce articular-like cartilage matrix in vitro [ 25 ]. Analysis was carried out using in situ micro-CT mechanical testing and DVC on an explanted tissue-biomaterial sample (n = 1) including newly formed tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, more sophisticated models of the electromechanobiology of cells and tissues need to be found to eventually predict the deformation or displacement of cells in their native environment [ 67 ]. Such models could then explain, for example, why and how a certain channel size in printed scaffolds influences the cell shape [ 68 ]. Eventually, an optimal channel width should be determined to promote chondrogenesis, which goes along with spherical cell shape.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%