2018 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/vcip.2018.8698654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SC-IQA: Shift compensation based image quality assessment for DIBR-synthesized views

Abstract: Depth-image-based-rendering (DIBR) has been used to generate the virtual views for Multi-view videos and Freeviewpoint videos. However, the quality assessment of DIBRsynthesized views is very challenging owing to the new types of distortions induced by inaccurate depth maps, dis-occlusions and image inpainting methods. There exist a large number of object shifts and geometric distortions in the synthesized view which the traditional 2D quality metrics may fail to assess. In this paper, we propose a shift compe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the PSNR and SSIM [ 11 ] are traditional IQA metrics. The VSQA [ 16 ], 3DSwIM [ 17 ], ST-SIAQ [ 18 ], EM-IQA [ 19 ], MW-PSNR [ 20 ], MP-PSNR [ 21 ], SC-IQA [ 22 ], and IDEA [ 23 ] are FR IQA metrics for 3D synthesized images. The APT [ 24 ], MNSS [ 25 ], OUT [ 26 ], NR-MWT [ 28 ], SET [ 30 ], NIQSV [ 31 ], NIQSV+ [ 32 ], CLGM [ 33 ], GANs-NRM [ 34 ], and Wang [ 35 ] are NR metrics designed for 3D synthesized images.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, the PSNR and SSIM [ 11 ] are traditional IQA metrics. The VSQA [ 16 ], 3DSwIM [ 17 ], ST-SIAQ [ 18 ], EM-IQA [ 19 ], MW-PSNR [ 20 ], MP-PSNR [ 21 ], SC-IQA [ 22 ], and IDEA [ 23 ] are FR IQA metrics for 3D synthesized images. The APT [ 24 ], MNSS [ 25 ], OUT [ 26 ], NR-MWT [ 28 ], SET [ 30 ], NIQSV [ 31 ], NIQSV+ [ 32 ], CLGM [ 33 ], GANs-NRM [ 34 ], and Wang [ 35 ] are NR metrics designed for 3D synthesized images.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this concern, some researchers have proposed IQA metrics targeting 3D synthesized images. These methods are mainly divided into two categories, full-reference (FR) [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and no-reference (NR) [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scores are mapped to the ground truth of each view pair using the non-linearity equation as given in [3]. [8] NR IQA 0.6881 0.6261 3 SC-IQA [14] FR IQA 0.6620 0.5960 4 DSCB [9] NR IQA 0.6030 0.5571 5 LOGS [15] FR IQA 0.6280 0.6160 6 MP-PSNR [16] FR IQA 0.6190 0.5809 7 MW-PSNR [17] FR IQA 0.5389 0.4875 8 Wang's [18] NR IQA 0.4338 0.4254 9 APT [3] NR IQA 0.4329 0.4164 10 Jakhetiya [19] NR IQA 0.2715 0.2352 11 OMIQA [20] NR IQA 0.2705 0.2331 12 NIQSV+ [21] NR IQA 0.2324 0.1545…”
Section: Experiments Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, these results will motivate future researchers to use cosine similarity instead of MSE when distortions are not uniformly distributed across the images. Further,in order to show that the proposed algorithm is performing better than the existing ones, we compared the it with the recently proposed five FR (SSPD [10], SC-IQA [14], LOGS [15], MP-PSNR [16], MW-PSNR [17]) and seven NR quality assessment algorithms (Yan's [8], DSCB [9], Wang's [18], APT [3], Jakhetiya's [19], OMIQA [20], NIQSV+ [21]). As depicted in Table 3, the proposed method outperforms the contemporary IQA metrics developed for DIBR synthesized views.…”
Section: Experiments Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%