Say our name (and say it right)! Extending Walton et al. on the evolution of race in political science scholarship

Abstract

To explore the evolution of political-science research on race, Walton et al., have done a systematic review of more than a century of publications appearing in the discipline's oldest and most prestigious journals: Political Science Quarterly and the American Political Science Review, respectively. Walton and his colleagues uncover "dual traditions" of race scholarship: an "African American Politics" (AAP) paradigm emphasizing empowerment and Blacks' cultural distinctiveness, and a "Race Relations Politics" (RRP) approach that focuses on Blacks' socio-political status vis-à-vis Whites. Using computer-assisted text analyses, we introduce a measure of racial dialogue that is informed by theory and has suitable empirical properties. We replicate and extend Walton's research by adding a third periodical (the Journal of Politics) and demonstrating that, while race conversations are becoming more frequent over time, the dialogues taking place in mainstream journals typically fit Walton's RRP (rather than AAP) tradition. Following our analyses, we offer guidelines for researchers seeking to apply our measure to alternative contexts.

The Politics of the Black Power Movement

“…One tradition, described as the African American politics (AAP) paradigm, was oriented toward frames of black empowerment and cultural particularity, such as Black Power ideologies; the other, the race relations politics (RRP) paradigm, focused more on comparative interracial socioeconomic dynamics. In a subsequent study, McClerking & Block (2016) confirmed their earlier findings. Adding the Journal of Politics to their study, the authors write that "the dialogues taking place in mainstream journals typically fit Walton's RRP (rather than AAP) paradigm" (McClerking & Block 2016, p. 2).…”