Research Handbook on Shareholder Power 2015
DOI: 10.4337/9781782546856.00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Say on pay

Abstract: The purpose of this chapter is to present key insights from the academic research on the economic consequences of SOP. The chapter is organized around five parts. Section I provides a brief history of SOP, highlighting its role in the broader context of a gradual shift toward greater shareholder empowerment. The rich set of legislative events accompanying the adoption of SOP in many countries has provided fertile ground for empirical studies. Section II and Section III review the evidence in such studies, focu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapidly growing literature on say on pay echoes these different opinions and finds mixed evidence (Ferri 2015). One strand of the literature focuses on the effects of the introduction of sayon-pay regulation on firm value and reports inconclusive results (Cai and Walking 2011, Larcker et al 2011, Ferri and Maber 2013.…”
Section: Related Literature On Say On Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rapidly growing literature on say on pay echoes these different opinions and finds mixed evidence (Ferri 2015). One strand of the literature focuses on the effects of the introduction of sayon-pay regulation on firm value and reports inconclusive results (Cai and Walking 2011, Larcker et al 2011, Ferri and Maber 2013.…”
Section: Related Literature On Say On Paymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that shareholders do not necessarily oppose high CEO pay, so long as the level of pay reflects the quality or economic performance of the CEO. However, shareholders are dissatisfied when they believe or perceive that, given the underlying economic performance, high CEO pay is unjustified or 'excessive' (Ferri andMaber 2013, Krause et al 2014). It is not uncommon for shareholders to resort to remuneration reports for detailed information regarding CEO pay arrangements when they have doubts about the 'appropriateness' of the CEO compensation.…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%