2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAXS study of ion tracks in San Carlos olivine and Durango apatite

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIon tracks were generated in crystalline San Carlos olivine (Mg,Fe) 2 SiO 4 and Durango apatite Ca 10 (PO 4 ) 6 F 2 using different heavy ions ( 58 Ni, 101 Ru, 129 Xe, 197 Au, and 238 U) with energies ranging between 185 MeV and 2.6 GeV. The tracks and their annealing behavior were studied by means of synchrotron based small angle X-ray scattering in combination with in situ annealing. Track radii vary as a function of electronic energy loss but are very similar in both minerals. Furthermore, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the fits in figure 2, the average latent track radius measured by SAXS for Durango apatite irradiated with 2.3 GeV Bi ions is 5.00±0.08 nm which consistent with the previous studies for apatite [15,16]. On the other hand, for the sample irradiated with 185 MeV, the track radius is 0.5 nm larger with a value of 5.50±0.12 nm which also matches the result reported in [4]. This has been observed previously and explained by the so-called velocity effect [4].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the fits in figure 2, the average latent track radius measured by SAXS for Durango apatite irradiated with 2.3 GeV Bi ions is 5.00±0.08 nm which consistent with the previous studies for apatite [15,16]. On the other hand, for the sample irradiated with 185 MeV, the track radius is 0.5 nm larger with a value of 5.50±0.12 nm which also matches the result reported in [4]. This has been observed previously and explained by the so-called velocity effect [4].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, for the sample irradiated with 185 MeV, the track radius is 0.5 nm larger with a value of 5.50±0.12 nm which also matches the result reported in [4]. This has been observed previously and explained by the so-called velocity effect [4]. The values of electronic energy loss dE/dx for both irradiation conditions calculated from SRIM2008 [17] are 24 keV/nm for 185 Mev Au ions and 29.1 keV/nm for 2.3 Gev Bi ions respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations