2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-007-1947-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAXS observation of RCM1 under cyclical shear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of orientation function for RCM1 processed in cycle '5-5-18' (Fig. 5a), at high wall shear rate (1125 s À1 ) are in agreement with the previous work, 31 where individual frames were collected for 5 s. Our data represent higher time resolution, 1 s frames. The data reveal a trend of decreasing P 2 values during flow and increasing orientation in the pause period.…”
Section: X-ray Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values of orientation function for RCM1 processed in cycle '5-5-18' (Fig. 5a), at high wall shear rate (1125 s À1 ) are in agreement with the previous work, 31 where individual frames were collected for 5 s. Our data represent higher time resolution, 1 s frames. The data reveal a trend of decreasing P 2 values during flow and increasing orientation in the pause period.…”
Section: X-ray Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To investigate the dynamics of microstructure changes during processing we applied a time resolved technique described by Cooney et al 31 The method is based on collection of many short X-ray exposures over many repetitions of the same deformation cycle. The overall X-ray image was a sum of frames taken in the same cycle step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assumption of structural and dynamic symmetry, however, is often invoked in theory and simulation.There are already several experimental investigations on the orientation kinetics of DBCPs in mechanical fields, [1,[28][29][30][31][32] but the polymer systems used in these experiments did not have similar dynamics in both polymer blocks, making a compar ison to computer simulations untractable, because the simula tion times of the orientation process scales linearly with the dif ference in polymer dynamics and thus cannot be conducted in a reasonable time frame.Recent rheological studies could not answer these questions on the local reorientation processes for dynamically symmetric copolymers on the microscopic length scale. [33][34][35][36][37][38] To under stand the process on this length scale, experiments should be supported by computer simulations and vice versa. To cover the multiple time and length scales involved in those processes,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent rheological studies could not answer these questions on the local reorientation processes for dynamically symmetric copolymers on the microscopic length scale. [33][34][35][36][37][38] To under stand the process on this length scale, experiments should be supported by computer simulations and vice versa. To cover the multiple time and length scales involved in those processes,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%