Savoring and Dampening with Passion: How Passionate People Respond when Good Things Happen

Abstract

AcknowledgementsThis is a pre-print of an article published in the Journal of Happiness Studies. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi. AbstractHow do people react when they experience a positive event while pursuing a passionate activity?In this research, we conducted three studies to test if the extent to which people respond to positive events by engaging in savoring (i.e., attempting to maintain or enhance positive emotions) and dampening (i.e., attempting to down-regulated or stifle positive emotions) is predicted by levels of harmonious and obsessive passion for an activity. Study 1 (n = 321) andStudy 2 (n = 547) both showed that harmonious passion positively predicted savoring, whereas obsessive passion predicted less savoring and greater dampening. Moreover, in Study 2, savoring mediated the relationships between both passion varieties and well-being outcomes. In Study 3, we extended these findings and tested if these relationships depended on whether a positive event was a result of an in-progress or completed achievement. Soccer fans (n = 394) imagined how they would react if their favorite team won either the semi-final (in-progress condition) or final (completed condition) of the ongoing UEFA champions league. In both scenarios, harmonious passion was a stronger predictor of savoring than obsessive passion.Obsessive passion also showed strong relationships with dampening in both scenarios, although this relationship was attenuated in the completed condition. Overall, these results reveal that passion varieties matter for predicting how people manage their good feelings following positive events, a finding that has implications for our understanding of the pathways that link passion varieties with well-being outcomes.

Because excellencism is more than good enough: On the need to distinguish the pursuit of excellence from the pursuit of perfection.

“…Sample 2. We recruited university students using the participation pool of a Canadian university as part of a larger project about academic and favorite activities (Schellenberg & Gaudreau, 2020). A total of 561 students participated in the study but 32 multivariate outliers, nine who reported not having answered the survey honestly, and 11 who did not answer the honesty-check question were removed from our analyses.…”

An inch away from being mentally tough: Performance bias in ratings of mental toughness.

“…2 This data set was collected as part of a larger project on the experiences of sport fans. All other reports from this larger project focus on different variables and test different hypotheses (e.g., Schellenberg & Gaudreau, 2020). This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.…”

Be Careful What You Wish For: The Double-Edged Sword of Perfectionism During Graduate Studies

“…Dropout intention was measured with three items (e.g., "I considered dropping out of graduate school") similar to those using in previous research (Schellenberg & Gaudreau, 2020).…”