Savings in public services after the crisis: a multilevel analysis of public preferences in the EU-27

Abstract

Policy responses to the global financial crisis can be divided into pro-and counter-cyclical approaches. The former advocates reducing public spending in times of financial constraints. The latter approach advocates public spending to boost the economy. Using public opinion (N=23,652) data from 27 EU member countries, we empirically test a model for citizen preferences for reducing spending in public services versus government investment in measures to boost the economy as a response to the financial crisis. We look at individual-and country-level determinants of attitudes to savings in public services, and concentrate on four groups of explanations: political disaffection, ideology, self-interest, and macro-economic conditions. It was found that political disaffection, and the respondent's ideological orientation all have effects on preferences, as well as whether one experiences economic strain or receives welfare services. Macro-economic conditions, such as a country's government deficit level, public debt or public expenditure have, surprisingly, no effect on citizens' financial policy preferences. We discuss the implications of our results for public administration theory and practice. Points for practitionersThe article analyses citizens' preferred government reactions to the financial crisis. It distinguishes between reducing public spending and measures to boost the economy. It was found that macro-economic conditions matter very little for these preferences. In fact, explanations for these attitudes and preferences need to be looked for primarily at the individual level, not the country level. Preferences for or against savings in public services are largely influenced by ideological dispositions, age, education, overall levels of political trust, and whether citizens are (potential) beneficiaries of welfare services. The article contributes to understanding why citizens support or oppose pro-or counter-cyclical policy measures to emerge from the crisis.

Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: taking stock

“…Finally, numerous authors (Boin et al., 2008; Pollitt, 2010) also draw attention to the fact that the democratic context has dramatically changed over the last few decades. For example, the citizens’ trust in governments has declined (Van de Walle and Jilke, 2012), the role and influence of the mass media has significantly increased, citizens have become more demanding, have ‘little patience for imperfections’ (Boin et al., 2008: 8), and ask for quick and easy solutions (Pandey, 2010: 566).…”

How Cutbacks and Job Satisfaction Are Related: The Role of Top-Level Public Managers’ Autonomy

“…Next to decreasing managerial autonomy, the implementation of cutbacks can be expected to increase the political interference that top-level managers experience. Because cutbacks are essentially about political choices, politicians are likely to have preferences about what programs or policies to cut (Van de Walle & Jilke, 2014). Politicians are thus likely to become a more dominant factor in decision-making processes (Levine, 1978), and increase their scrutiny on organizational affairs.…”

What Shapes Citizens' Evaluations of Their Public Officials' Accountability? Evidence From Local Ethiopia

“…those who are poor or unemployed), then they are more likely to support governmental policies that aim at increasing welfare services. In addition, citizens' attitudes towards government in general are often explained as a result of other underlying political attitudes and more general values, such as trust (Li, 2004;Bratton and Logan, 2006), or partisan ideology (Jacoby, 1994;Van de Walle and Jilke, 2013). In other words, if citizens have a particular ideological disposition, this may influence their attitudes towards government.…”