2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saving the sea turtles of Anguilla: Combining scientific data with community perspectives to inform policy decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More broadly, this study adds to a growing body of telemetry research on hawksbills in the Caribbean Region (Becking et al, 2016;Esteban et al, 2015;Hart et al, 2019;Horrocks et al, 2001;Maurer, Dawson, et al, 2022;Moncada et al, 2012;Nivière et al, 2018;Revuelta et al, 2015;Soanes et al, 2022;Troëng et al, 2005;van Dam et al, 2008). Tracking work, combined with studies using other methodologies, such as flipper tag returns (Horrocks et al, 2011;Moncada et al, 2012), may represent a basis for developing a 'foraging-centric' view of geographic distributions that would build upon seminal 'nesting-centric' concepts (see point 3 below for more).…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More broadly, this study adds to a growing body of telemetry research on hawksbills in the Caribbean Region (Becking et al, 2016;Esteban et al, 2015;Hart et al, 2019;Horrocks et al, 2001;Maurer, Dawson, et al, 2022;Moncada et al, 2012;Nivière et al, 2018;Revuelta et al, 2015;Soanes et al, 2022;Troëng et al, 2005;van Dam et al, 2008). Tracking work, combined with studies using other methodologies, such as flipper tag returns (Horrocks et al, 2011;Moncada et al, 2012), may represent a basis for developing a 'foraging-centric' view of geographic distributions that would build upon seminal 'nesting-centric' concepts (see point 3 below for more).…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Indeed, the Leeward Islands and neighbouring territories have served as the site of a large proportion of hawksbill transmitter deployments from Caribbean nesting beaches to date (e.g. Hart et al, 2019; Soanes et al, 2022), likely biassing observations of relatively high foraging use. Tracking individuals from additional rookeries will be necessary to refine the understanding of foraging distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), for example, are not as strictly philopatric as other species [74], and individuals display a range of nesting behaviours with some laying nests over 400 km apart in a single nesting season [75]. Hawksbill females, by contrast, are among the more faithful of sea turtles to their natal nesting beaches [76][77][78][79], but many populations are genetically connected through male-mediated gene flow, particularly when rookeries are located along the same coastline [80,81]. Compared to what has been reported for hawksbills in other parts of the world, the level of genetic differentiation observed among Hawaiian nesting complexes was high and unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female leatherback turtles ( Dermochelys coriacea ), for example, are not as strictly philopatric as other species (Thorson et al 2012), and individuals display a range of nesting behaviors with some laying nests over 400 km apart in a single nesting season (Stewart et al 2014b). Hawksbill females, in contrast, are among the more faithful of sea turtles to their natal nesting areas (Bowen et al 2007; Monzón-Argüello et al 2011; Gaos et al 2016; Soanes et al 2022), but many populations are genetically connected through male-mediated gene flow, particularly when rookeries are located along the same coastline (Phillips et al 2014; Levasseur et al 2019; see also Roden et al in review). Compared to what has been reported for hawksbills in other parts of the world, the level of genetic differentiation observed among Hawaiian nesting complexes was high and unexpected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%