2016
DOI: 10.11612/resphil.2016.93.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saving Mental Fictionalism from Cognitive Collapse

Abstract: Mental fictionalism maintains that: (1) folk psychology is a false theory, but (2) we should nonetheless keep using it, because it is useful, convenient, or otherwise beneficial to do so. We should (or do) treat folk psychology as a useful fiction-false, but valuable. Yet some argue that mental fictionalism is incoherent: if a mental fictionalist rejects folk psychology then she cannot appeal to fictions in an effort to keep folk psychological discourse around, because fictions presuppose the legitimacy of fol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So mental fictionalism is incoherent: the very act of stating the position requires commitment to the existence of mental states. This is perhaps the most serious objection facing mental fictionalism, and I cannot hope to deal with it properly here (for fuller discussions, see Wallace 2014, Joyce 2013, Parent 2013. The most promising response for the fictionalist, I believe, echoes Churchland's (1981) well-known response on behalf of eliminativism (see also Wallace 2007, Joyce 2013).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So mental fictionalism is incoherent: the very act of stating the position requires commitment to the existence of mental states. This is perhaps the most serious objection facing mental fictionalism, and I cannot hope to deal with it properly here (for fuller discussions, see Wallace 2014, Joyce 2013, Parent 2013. The most promising response for the fictionalist, I believe, echoes Churchland's (1981) well-known response on behalf of eliminativism (see also Wallace 2007, Joyce 2013).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, and perhaps most worryingly, a critic might argue that mental fictionalism is incoherent (e.g. Wallace 2007, 2014, Daly 2013, Joyce 2013, Parent 2013. The charge of incoherence mirrors a well-known objection to eliminativism.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason it is important is that it allows us to address a serious difficulty facing the approach, often called the problem of 'cognitive collapse' (e.g. Wallace, 2016). The fictionalist claims that inner representations do not exist and that our talk about them is merely a useful fiction.…”
Section: Intentionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of authors have begun to explore fictionalist approaches to folk psychology (e.g. Demeter 2013; Toon, 2016;Wallace 2007Wallace , 2016. In this paper, my aim is not to offer general arguments in favour of fictionalism, or against representationalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, an eliminativist would be still able to use belief talk and consequently say that she does believe in eliminativism, whilst still denying that that there are any beliefs. This solution is controversial (see Wallace 2016 for the overview of the debate on the consistency of mental fictionalism), but it shows that the problem of attitudes is not necessarily fatal for eliminativism.…”
Section: Eliminative Materialism and The Problem Of Truthmentioning
confidence: 99%