2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.5.043702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saturation mechanism of the fluctuation dynamo at PrM  1

Abstract: The presence of magnetic fields in many astrophysical objects is due to dynamo action, whereby a part of the kinetic energy is converted into magnetic energy. A turbulent dynamo that produces magnetic field structures on the same scale as the turbulent flow is known as the fluctuation dynamo. We use numerical simulations to explore the nonlinear, statistically steady state of the fluctuation dynamo in driven turbulence. We demonstrate that as the magnetic field growth saturates, its amplification and diffusion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(118 reference statements)
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar p.d.f.s were calculated recently for the isotropic-MHD dynamo by Seta et al. (2020), whose results agree broadly with those presented here in figures 15 and 16 for isotropic MHD.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similar p.d.f.s were calculated recently for the isotropic-MHD dynamo by Seta et al. (2020), whose results agree broadly with those presented here in figures 15 and 16 for isotropic MHD.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Once the mean magnetic energy becomes comparable to the energy of the viscous-scale motions (viz., B 2 rms ∼ U 2 Re −1/2 ), the kinematic stage ends and the dynamo becomes nonlinear. Namely, the Lorentz force due to the spatially coherent magnetic folds back-reacts on the viscous-scale motions and suppresses their ability to amplify the magnetic field [17,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. As a result, progressively larger (and slower) eddies are responsible for amplifying the field, while the eddies whose energies are lower,…”
Section: A Generation and Persistence Of Magnetic Foldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two approaches produce concordant results wherever their domains of applicability overlap (Chertkov et al 1999;Il'yn et al 2021), they are also verified by numerical simulations (Mason et al 2011;Schekochihin et al 2004;Seta et al 2020). However, there remains the domain where neither of them can be applied: processes with non-Gaussian and/or not δ-correlated velocity statistics cannot be analyzed at late (inertial) stage of their evolution neither by the Lagrangian deformations approach nor by the classical Kazantsev method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%