2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satisfying light conditions: A field study on perception of consensus light in Dutch open office environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another participant raised the lighting again at the end of the day, because she had her "midday dip"; she felt that "more light would be good again." In the dynamic lighting scenarios, this rise was applied directly after lunch (de Kort and Smolders 2010;Motamed et al 2016), but we identified that participants in this study preferred increasing levels later in the afternoon, which is in line with Chraibi et al (2016) and Newsham et al (2008). At the beginning and end of the day, the majority chose higher luminances compared to the previous moment, suggesting that dynamic scenarios should apply an increase at these moments; for the other times, the first and third quartiles reached into both the positive and negative; hence, it remains difficult to provide a suggestion on how to vary the luminances over the day to satisfy this subset of users with dynamic preferences.…”
Section: Variation In Preferred Luminance Distributions Over the Workdaysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another participant raised the lighting again at the end of the day, because she had her "midday dip"; she felt that "more light would be good again." In the dynamic lighting scenarios, this rise was applied directly after lunch (de Kort and Smolders 2010;Motamed et al 2016), but we identified that participants in this study preferred increasing levels later in the afternoon, which is in line with Chraibi et al (2016) and Newsham et al (2008). At the beginning and end of the day, the majority chose higher luminances compared to the previous moment, suggesting that dynamic scenarios should apply an increase at these moments; for the other times, the first and third quartiles reached into both the positive and negative; hence, it remains difficult to provide a suggestion on how to vary the luminances over the day to satisfy this subset of users with dynamic preferences.…”
Section: Variation In Preferred Luminance Distributions Over the Workdaysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, Newsham et al (2008) identified that, on average, participants chose an increasing desktop illuminance in the morning and a decreasing value in the afternoon. Chraibi et al (2016), however, revealed in a real office environment that occupants dimmed down the luminaires more often in the morning, whereas at the end of the day they dimmed them up. Clearly, their results do not agree; their different experimental designs are likely one cause; nevertheless, this indicates a need for research that clarifies these ambiguities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The authors in Ref. [23] justify the need to offer lighting that serves the preferences of individuals, and they assert that "by offering illuminances close to peoples' own preferences a significant improvement in ratings of mood, lighting satisfaction, and environmental satisfaction can be established". In Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [23], it was observed from an experimental study that consensus control improved user appreciation of office lighting in an open office. It was also emphasized in Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem happens because the regulations don't take into account all the lighting parameters which influence visual comfort, it being necessary to take the measurements in situ [1]. Furthermore, it must be considered that aspects such as sensitivity or character could influence user lighting preferences [2] as well as cultural differences [3]. If we focus on the concept of lighting in workplaces, it is possible to see how proper lighting is essential, allowing users to see without difficulties the tasks being carried out, increasing productivity [4], and reducing accident risk and fatigue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%