2022
DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2022.0027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satisfaction with and Use of Inhalation Devices in Patients with Bronchial Asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 27 In addition, education and training to use the inhalation device is crucial. The vast majority of patients were trained on how to use the inhalation device, consistent with findings in Korea (95.4%) 20 and Colombia (93.9%) 16 and higher than that documented in Spain (80.5%). 28 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… 27 In addition, education and training to use the inhalation device is crucial. The vast majority of patients were trained on how to use the inhalation device, consistent with findings in Korea (95.4%) 20 and Colombia (93.9%) 16 and higher than that documented in Spain (80.5%). 28 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A total of 58.9% of COPD patients used metered-dose inhalers, which is in line with previous reports of subjects with asthma in Colombia (73.0%). 16 In Europe and Asia, dry powder inhalers are the predominant devices (61.1–88.9%). 18 , 22 , 25 , 26 According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, COPD patients prefer inhalation devices that are small, durable, easy to use, and quick to administer the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since budesonide cannot directly affect leukotriene-mediated processes, as suggested by multiple studies, it has demonstrated inadequate clinical effectiveness in reducing leukotriene-mediated inflammatory reactions. 24,25 Meanwhile, long-term use of budesonide in children easily leads to osteoporosis, decreased adrenocortical function, and other statistically and significantly superior to the control group (P < 0.05). It was concluded that the integration of drugs was conducive to the recovery of immune capacity in children.…”
Section: Comparison Of Symptom Recovery Between Both Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%