The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satisfaction, utilisation and perceived benefit of individual psychosocial support for breast cancer patients—A randomised study of nurse versus psychologist interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
94
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This number is nearly twice as high as the corresponding number in the (age-matched) general population. This confirms previous findings and indicates the need for screening psychological distress in order to provide adequate psychological support for the women [24]. The severity of the psychological burden generally diminished over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This number is nearly twice as high as the corresponding number in the (age-matched) general population. This confirms previous findings and indicates the need for screening psychological distress in order to provide adequate psychological support for the women [24]. The severity of the psychological burden generally diminished over time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…patients go through, a period of relatively rapid improvement with regard to HRQOL, including emotional functioning, after diagnosis and medical treatment Glimelius, 1997, 1998;Arving et al, 2007). Thus, the measures used in this study seem to be capable of detecting statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements with regard to these aspects.…”
Section: Subscalesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, it is still unclear whether individual or group support is more effective in relieving problems of anxiety and depression (Sheard and Maguire, 1999;Osborn et al, 2006). Different types of interventions have been evaluated in different diagnostic groups and at different times in the illness trajectory (Arving et al, 2007;May et al, 2008), which makes it difficult to assess the clinical value of the trial results. In addition, a majority of the studies include small samples, which jeopardises the possibilities of detecting small but clinically relevant differences between groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encouraging situation is explained by extended multidisciplinary efforts to improve patient care including palliative chemotherapy (2), nutritional support (3,4), systemic antiinflammatory treatment, and pain treatment (4 -7), which are all founded on evidence-based medicine. Our earlier studies of host metabolism in response to progressive malignancy were usually carried out on hospitalized patients, in part due to the application of considerably invasive models (8 -10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%