Satisfaction rate of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery compared to conventional hospitalization: a prospective non-randomized study

Badaoui, R.; Rebibo, Lionel; Kirat, Kahina; Alami, Youssef; Hchikat, Abdelhakim; Cossé, Cyril; Régimbeau, Jean-Marc; Lorne, Emmanuel

doi:10.1007/s00540-018-2469-9

Cited by 10 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Badaoui et al [19] in their prospective, comparative, evaluation of the satisfaction of general anesthesia of patients undergoing LSG as outpatient (62 patients) and as inpatient (62 patients) based on the EVAN-G questionnaire found a mean score of 66.4 in the outpatient group vs. 68.9 in the inpatient group (not significant difference). In the outpatient group, 19% of patients would have preferred to spend the first night in hospital while in the conventional hospitalization group, 82% of patients would have preferred outpatient management (average length of stay of 1.9 days (1-3)).…”

Section: Mid-term Results and Satisfaction Ratementioning

confidence: 98%

“…Only six of these studies were relevant. On these 6 series, there was three single centre retrospective studies [15 -17] , two single centre prospective studies [18,19] and one retrospective, comparative, national database analysis [20] . On these 6 series, two series reported the same population of DCS but one focused on surgical data while the other focused on anaesthesiology data (Table 1).…”

Section: Assessment Of the Quality Of Selected Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a review of the literature

Rebibo

Maurice

Nimier

et al. 2019

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Mid-term Results and Satisfaction Ratementioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Assessment Of the Quality Of Selected Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a review of the literature

Rebibo

Maurice

Nimier

et al. 2019

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In another larger study including more than 130,000 patients, the DC bariatric surgery readmission rate was 4.4% and 2.8% for all patients and those who underwent LSG alone, respectively [33] . Studies that assessed DC-LSG alone reported a readmission rate ranging from 0% to 8.5% [19][20][21]31] , while those that assessed DC-LRYGB alone reported a rate of 1.7-4% [24,25,34] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The earliest DCS techniques for bariatric surgery used gastric banding [17,18] . The viability and safety of using DCS for LSG [19][20][21][22] , and LRYGB [23][24][25] procedures were been previously discussed and almost established. To date, no studies have investigated such an issue for OAGB.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety and Feasibility of Day Case Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery in the Egyptian Community

Hassan¹,

Mikhail²,

Ziada

et al. 2022

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Globally, the incidence of severe obesity and the comorbidities that it causes has increased. A patient who undergoes day-case surgery (DCS) is admitted and released the same day. The practicality and safety of using DCS during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedures have already been discussed and are almost established. As of yet, no studies have looked into this problem for OAGB. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of DC-OAGB in the Egyptian community and to compare it with DCS-LSG. Patients and methods: This is a prospective non-randomized controlled clinical trial that was conducted on 100 patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. Patients eligible for day-case surgery were included. The study patients were nonrandomly equally allocated to the DC-LSG group or the DC-OAGB group. Patients' operative data were recorded. They were followed by telephone for 4 days, and were followed again 15 days and 1 month later, and their satisfaction with DC bariatric surgery was assessed. Results: There was an equal same-day discharge rate (96%) in both groups. The total readmission rate was 1%, while for DC-LSG and DC-OAGB separately; the rates were 2% and 0%, respectively. The patients in the current study presented a high satisfaction rate. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the postoperative outcome. Conclusion: DC-OAGB as well as DC-LSG showed feasibility and safety. Patients for the DCS should be properly selected to avoid elevated morbidity and mortality rates. Patients were highly satisfied with the DCS protocol.

show abstract

“…The sample size was calculated based on our 65-patient pilot test. According to the formula N = Z 2 pq/δ 2 (α = 0.05, δ = 0.07, p = 56%, q = 1-p), [ 21 , 22 ] 193 patients were required for a statistical power of 90% power at the 0.05 significance level. Assuming a 15% dropout rate, 227 patients were deemed for this study.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the translated version of the EVAN-G scale in a Chinese-speaking population

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to translate the French version of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire (EVAN-G) scale, a validated questionnaire for assessing perioperative patient satisfaction, into a Chinese version and validate it in Chinese-speaking patients. Methods We developed the Chinese version of the EVAN-G (EVAN-GC) scale based on the original French version of the EVAN-G. The EVAN-GC scale, the Short version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (S-STAI), and the McGill pain questionnaire (MGPQ) were administered on the WeChat mini program. We invited patients to complete these questionnaires within 4 to 24 h after surgery. The psychometric validation of the EVAN-GC scale included validity, reliability, and acceptability. Results Among 220 patients, 217 (98.6%) completed the EVAN-GC scale after surgery. The item-internal consistency revealed good construct validity. Compared with the total scores of the S-STAI and MGPQ, the EVAN-GC scale showed excellent convergent validity (ρ = − 0.32, P < 0.001; ρ = − 0.29, P < 0.001). The EVAN-GC scale could differentiate between groups, which showed good discriminate validity. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.85) of the translated scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency reliability, and a 36-patient subsample retest evidenced good test-retest reliability (ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001). In addition, the median [interquartile range] time of completing the EVAN-GC scale was 3.7 [2.9–4.9] min. Conclusions The EVAN-GC scale has good psychometric properties similar to those of the original French version. The EVAN-GC scale is a valid and reliable measurement to assess patient satisfaction in Chinese-speaking patients. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100049555.

show abstract

Satisfaction rate of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery compared to conventional hospitalization: a prospective non-randomized study

Abstract: Overall satisfaction of patients undergoing SG as day-case surgery was not inferior to that of patients managed by conventional hospitalization.

Cited by 10 publications

References 22 publications

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a review of the literature

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery: a review of the literature

Safety and Feasibility of Day Case Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery in the Egyptian Community

Validation of the translated version of the EVAN-G scale in a Chinese-speaking population

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About