Satisfação Dos Pacientes Com a Técnica De Buttonhole

Silva, Dejanilton Melo da; Gurgel, Jonas Lí­rio; Escudeiro, Cristina Lavoyer; Ferreira, Helen Campos

doi:10.5380/ce.v20i3.41576

Cited by 2 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(19 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the study in this dissertation was included through a published article. 18 Table 3 provides a description of the included studies. Only four studies were directly about cannulation.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only four studies were directly about cannulation. 8,9,17,18 Other studies were about pain, 26,27 experiences of VA for haemodialysis, 14,[28][29][30][31][32][33] experiences of in-centre and home haemodialysis [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] and research priority setting. 47 Studies were conducted across five continents, but despite this diversity in study location themes extracted did not seem to vary due to culture, with the exception of one study, which developed themes linked to religion in a Thai culture.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For some, the pain was short-lived or minor: ‘ It hurts, but it only hurts when the skin is punctured, after that, it doesn’t hurt anymore ’. 18 Patients often appeared to become less bothered by pain from cannulation over time: ‘ I used to dread coming to dialysis due to the fear of the painful needles but now I am getting better ’. 8 For others pain progressed beyond the cannulation procedure or the pain was excessive: ‘ .…”

Section: Theme 1: Cannulation Is An Unpleasant Abnormal and Unique Pr...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…16 However, this does not provide detailed description or synthesis of findings. Four individual qualitative studies examine patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis in sub-populations 8,17 or parts of cannulation, 9,18 but provide no full description of this phenomenon. Therefore, we aimed to explore patients’ experiences of cannulation of AV access for haemodialysis.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The necessity and regularity of the procedure creates the need to survive this procedure, regardless of how unpleasant this is. 9,14,17,18,27,29,30,31,32,33,34,36,37,38,40,41,42,43,45,46 High confidence -…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Patients’ experiences of cannulation of arteriovenous access for haemodialysis: A qualitative systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Cannulation is an essential part of haemodialysis with arteriovenous access. Patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis are problematic but poorly understood. This review aims to synthesise findings related to patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis from qualitative studies, providing a fuller description of this phenomenon. Methods: Eligibility criteria defined the inclusion of studies with a population of patients with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis. The phenomena of interest was findings related to patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis and the context was both in-centre and home haemodialysis. MedLine, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, BNI, PsycInfo and PubMed were last searched between 20/05/2019 and 23/05/2019. The quality of studies was assessed using the using Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Meta-aggregation was used to synthesise findings and CERQual to assess the strength of accumulated findings. Results: This review included 26 studies. The subject of included studies covered cannulation, pain, experiences of vascular access, experiences of haemodialysis and a research priority setting exercise. From these studies, three themes were meta-aggregated: (1) Cannulation for haemodialysis is an unpleasant, abnormal and unique procedure associated with pain, abnormal appearance, vulnerability and dependency. (2) The necessity of cannulation for haemodialysis emphasises the unpleasantness of the procedure. Success had multiple meanings for patients and patients worry about whether the needle insertion will be successful. (3) Patients survive unpleasant, necessary and repetitive cannulation by learning to tolerate cannulation and exerting control over the procedure. Feeling safe can help them tolerate cannulation better and the cannulator can invoke feeling safe. However, some patients still avoid cannulation, due to its unpleasantness. Conclusions: Cannulation is a pervasive procedure that impacts on patients’ experiences of haemodialysis. This review illuminates further patients’ experiences of cannulation for haemodialysis, indicating how improvements can be made to cannulation. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42019134583).

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theme 1: Cannulation Is An Unpleasant Abnormal and Unique Pr...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Patients’ experiences of cannulation of arteriovenous access for haemodialysis: A qualitative systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

El método buttonhole como técnica de punción de la fístula arteriovenosa en hemodiálisis: Una revisión de la literatura

Amador-Marín

Martínez-Montilla

2016

eglobal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nº 44 Octubre 2016Página 341 REVISIONESEl método buttonhole como técnica de punción de la fístula arteriovenosa en hemodiálisis: Una revisión de la literatura RESUMENIntroducción: La hemodiálisis es el tratamiento de elección en los pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica. La clave para un tratamiento adecuado es tener un buen acceso vascular. Por ello, las fístulas arteriovenosas son consideradas la mejor opción. Uno de los principales factores que influyen en la supervivencia de estas es la técnica de punción realizada. El objetivo principal del estudio fue conocer el método buttonhole como técnica de punción de la fístula arteriovenosa en la hemodiálisis.Metodología: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura científica a través de las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cinahl y Cuiden Plus, desde 2011 hasta 2016. Además, se realizó una búsqueda secundaría manual.Resultados: Las estrategias iniciales de búsquedas identificaron un total de 84 resultados, siendo finalmente seleccionados 7 estudios. Los resultados encontrados han sido muy diversos, encontrándose resultados para el dolor, tasas de infección, tiempo de hemostasia, dilataciones aneurismáticas, flujo sanguíneo, presión venosa, número de intentos de canulación, seguridad, estética del brazo portador de la fístula y calidad de vida del paciente. Conclusiones:El método buttonhole parece ser una buena alternativa de punción, ya que está prácticamente exenta de las complicaciones habituales existentes en otras técnicas, como extravasaciones, hematomas, aneurismas, entre otras. Además, facilita la auto-punción en los domicilios. Por otro lado, es necesario un buen aprendizaje previo a la incorporación de esta técnica y un periodo de adaptación por parte de los profesionales, requiriendo implicación por parte de los mismos y del centro.

show abstract

Satisfação Dos Pacientes Com a Técnica De Buttonhole

Cited by 2 publications

References 12 publications

Patients’ experiences of cannulation of arteriovenous access for haemodialysis: A qualitative systematic review

Patients’ experiences of cannulation of arteriovenous access for haemodialysis: A qualitative systematic review

El método buttonhole como técnica de punción de la fístula arteriovenosa en hemodiálisis: Una revisión de la literatura

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About