1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6424(199711)80:11<22::aid-ecja3>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite interference location system using on-board multibeam antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the beam diameter 524 km, it is about one-tenth of the beam width, and the performance is equivalent with it in Matsumoto. 8 The location error is about 20 km when the signal strength measurement error is down to 0.6 dB, which outperforms that in Matsumoto. 8 From the above, the localization method can achieve finding the interference source without the help of other equipments onboard.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the beam diameter 524 km, it is about one-tenth of the beam width, and the performance is equivalent with it in Matsumoto. 8 The location error is about 20 km when the signal strength measurement error is down to 0.6 dB, which outperforms that in Matsumoto. 8 From the above, the localization method can achieve finding the interference source without the help of other equipments onboard.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…8 The location error is about 20 km when the signal strength measurement error is down to 0.6 dB, which outperforms that in Matsumoto. 8 From the above, the localization method can achieve finding the interference source without the help of other equipments onboard. There are two ways for the equation set solving: one is MLISM and the other is Newton iteration based on least square method.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations