Satellite DNAs—From Localized to Highly Dispersed Genome Components

Abstract

According to the established classical view, satellite DNAs are defined as abundant non-coding DNA sequences repeated in tandem that build long arrays located in heterochromatin. Advances in sequencing methodologies and development of specialized bioinformatics tools enabled defining a collection of all repetitive DNAs and satellite DNAs in a genome, the repeatome and the satellitome, respectively, as well as their reliable annotation on sequenced genomes. Supported by various non-model species included in recent studies, the patterns of satellite DNAs and satellitomes as a whole showed much more diversity and complexity than initially thought. Differences are not only in number and abundance of satellite DNAs but also in their distribution across the genome, array length, interspersion patterns, association with transposable elements, localization in heterochromatin and/or in euchromatin. In this review, we compare characteristic organizational features of satellite DNAs and satellitomes across different animal and plant species in order to summarize organizational forms and evolutionary processes that may lead to satellitomes’ diversity and revisit some basic notions regarding repetitive DNA landscapes in genomes.

Evolution of ancient satellite DNAs in extant alligators and caimans (Crocodylia, Reptilia)

“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 20, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.18.537305 doi: bioRxiv preprint 2021; Iwata et al 2013;Shang et al 2010;Garrido-Ramos 2017;Šatović-Vukšić and Plohl 2023). In Alligatoridae, constitutive heterochromatin is restricted to the pericentromeric regions (Oliveira et al 2021) and includes the (peri)centromeric clusters found for the satDNAs isolated in this study.…”

“…In general, a genome has a varied number of satDNA families (the satellitome, Ruiz-Ruano et al 2016) with varying nucleotide sequences and genomic abundance (Csink and Henikoff 1998;Kuhn et al 2008;Kuhn et al 2010;Plohl et al 2012;Feliciello et al 2015;Prakhongcheep et al 2017;Palacios-Gimenez et al 2017). Although some examples of small arrays scattered throughout euchromatin have been documented (Ruiz-Ruano et al 2016;Feliciello et al 2011Feliciello et al , 2015Kuhn et al 2012;Brajković et al 2012;Larracuente 2014;Pavlek et al 2015;Pita et al 2017;de Lima et al 2017;Robledillo et al 2020;Milani et al 2021), these sequences are often found in centromeres and in pericentromeric and subtelomeric heterochromatic areas (reviewed in Plohl et al 2012;Garrido-Ramos 2017;Šatović-Vukšić and Plohl 2023). More than just "junk DNA" (as for a long time considered) several studies have revealed that satDNAs have a role in a variety of biological processes, including gene regulation (Joshi and Meller 2017), centromere function (Rošić et al 2014), chromatin modulation (Ugarkovic 2005), and spatial chromosomal structure (Pathak et al 2013;Jagannathan et al 2018Jagannathan et al , 2019.…”

Repeat-based holocentromeres of the woodrushLuzula sylvaticareveal new insights into the evolutionary transition from mono- to holocentricity

“…2014; Ávila Robledillo et al . 2020; Šatović-Vukšić and Plohl 2023). Although the role of these repeats in centromere function has not yet been fully elucidated, several possible advantages of centromeric repeats have been proposed.…”

“…In most plants, functional centromeres are epigenetically specified by the centromeric histone H3 variant (CENH3). CENH3 binding regions (hereafter CENH3 domains) in monocentric chromosomes are typically associated with extended arrays of tandemly repeated sequences (satellite DNA), which are usually highly divergent and fast evolving (Allshire and Karpen 2008;Plohl et al 2014;Ávila Robledillo et al 2020;Šatović-Vukšić and Plohl 2023).…”