Satellite-based monitoring of groundwater depletion in California’s Central Valley

Abstract

Range change data, obtained from Synthetic Aperture Radar satellites, form the basis for estimates of aquifer volume change in California’s Central Valley. The estimation algorithm incorporates a function penalizing changes far from known well locations, linking the aquifer volume changes to agricultural, industrial, and municipal pumping within the Tulare basin. We show that the range changes are compatible with the hypothesis that the source of aquifer volume changes are variations in effective pressure around documented wells. Specifically, inclusion of the well distance penalty does not degrade the fit to the observations, inversions with and without it both give variance reductions of 99.6%. The patterns of aquifer volume change vary significantly from the drought year, between October 2015 and October 2016, to a wet year in 2017, and into 2018, a year with near average rainfall. The 2.3 million acre-feet of estimated volume reduction, a lower bound on the amount of water extracted from the basin between October 2015 and 2016, agrees with independent estimates of 1.8 and 2.3 million acre-feet. The aquifer volume reduction is also compatible with a loss of 3.1 km3 (2.5 million acre-feet) in groundwater volume derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite data.

Monitoring the fate of injected CO2 using geodetic techniques

“…Due to the difficulty of the inverse problem it is important to devise appropriate regularization schemes to stabilize the process of estimating a solution. One particularly useful approach for volume changes that are induced by fluid extraction and injection into a reservoir, is a regularization or penalty term that favors volume changes near known well locations (Vasco et al 2010, Rucci et al 2013, Vasco et al 2019. Such a penalty term utilizes the fact that the effective pressure changes surrounding the well are driving the volume changes within the reservoir.…”

Using geodetic data in geothermal areas

“…The early development of many geodetic techniques in the Earth sciences was for the study of natural hazards such as volcanoes (Dzurisin 2007) and earthquakes with their correspondingly larger ground deformation than that due to geothermal activity. However, several techniques have been adopted to study such processes as subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal (Vasco et al 2019), ground movement induced by the sequestration of carbon dioxide (Vasco et al 2020), deformation due to oil and gas development (Fielding et al 1998), as well as to study surface displacements associated with geothermal production. LiDAR (Eitel et al 2016), is one emerging technology that we shall not discuss.…”

Early Warning from Space for a Few Key Tipping Points in Physical, Biological, and Social-Ecological Systems

“…Remote sensing data have also been used in monitoring other variables in land and resource use systems, to assess soil salinity (Ivushkin et al 2018), aquifer volume and groundwater drought (Thomas et al 2017;Vasco et al 2019), and temperature warming over landscapes and oceans (FEWS NET 2018a, b). It has been used to identify hotspot areas of high N inputs and to model biogeochemical processes of N flows in agricultural systems (Liu et al 2020).…”

“…Thomas et al (2017) used NASA's GRACE satellite mission data to quantify groundwater storage deficits in California's central Valley, enabling them to capture groundwater drought. Using InSAR, Vasco et al (2019) could better match the identified change in aquifer volume in the valley with point observations, an improvement compared to using only the GRACE data.…”