Remote Sensing for Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Hydrology XX 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2325536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite-based cover management factor assessment for soil water erosion in the Alps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of our simulations, we described the dynamics of the cover management factor through the following land cover maps: Clearly, future projections of the cover management factor cannot exploit the satellite observations for reproducing the seasonal dynamics of vegetation. Thus, the cover management factor was estimated by assigning a fixed value to land cover classes at each simulation period (Table 2) [35,47]. This means that our simulations only considered the trend of the C-factor and were not able to reproduce its seasonal variability.…”
Section: Projections Of Future Cover Management Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of our simulations, we described the dynamics of the cover management factor through the following land cover maps: Clearly, future projections of the cover management factor cannot exploit the satellite observations for reproducing the seasonal dynamics of vegetation. Thus, the cover management factor was estimated by assigning a fixed value to land cover classes at each simulation period (Table 2) [35,47]. This means that our simulations only considered the trend of the C-factor and were not able to reproduce its seasonal variability.…”
Section: Projections Of Future Cover Management Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The erosion scenarios obtained with static land cover are hereafter referred to as SIM#4.5_D2015 and SIM#8.5_D2015, depending on the climate scenarios used. Figure 12 presents the comparison of observed [35,47] vs. the simulated mean annual soil erosion rates for the period 2003-2017 and using the two climate scenarios SIM#4.5 and SIM#8.5. The simulated maps show spatial patterns that are similar to those observed, but the erosion rates are underestimated of about 29% in SIM#4.5_D2015 and 44% in SIM#8.5_D2015 ( Table 6).…”
Section: Effect Of Climate Projections On the Estimates Of Soil Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation