2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satellite-altitude horizontal magnetic gradient anomalies used to define the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is one of the largest-amplitude magnetic anomalies in Russia. In ground-based measurements, the maximum amplitude of the Kursk anomaly was found to be nearly 200,000 nT (Ravat et al, 1993;Taylor et al, 2014). The distribution of the Kursk magnetic anomaly is correlated with the large iron-ore deposit in the Voronezh Crystalline Massif of the Ukrainian Shield, a Precambrian basement structure (Ravat et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is one of the largest-amplitude magnetic anomalies in Russia. In ground-based measurements, the maximum amplitude of the Kursk anomaly was found to be nearly 200,000 nT (Ravat et al, 1993;Taylor et al, 2014). The distribution of the Kursk magnetic anomaly is correlated with the large iron-ore deposit in the Voronezh Crystalline Massif of the Ukrainian Shield, a Precambrian basement structure (Ravat et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previously we Taylor et al [13] calculated the horizontal gradients over the Kursk magnetic anomaly. In this study the vertical, north and east gradients will be computed.…”
Section: Determining Champ Magnetic Anomaly Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest previous studies showed that Swarm satellites can be used for monitoring electrical conductivity of the mantle (Civet et al, 2015), analysing the external magnetic field (Moretto et al, 2006), interpretation of regional total magnetic field (Taylor et al, 2014;Taylor et al, 2019), monitoring the magnetic field as an earthquake precursor (Akhoondzadeh, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%