Poster Presentations 2017
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-eular.1886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAT0574 Performance of immunoglobulin M and G (IGM and IGG) antibodies against chikungunya virus (CHIKV) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) technique

Abstract: BackgroundCHIKV is suspected based on epidemiological and clinical criteria, however confirmation of the disease is only achieved by laboratory tests. Laboratory diagnosis is made by two approaches: the detection of viral RNA and identification of the specific immune response by serological methods. Serological tests are the most frequently used laboratory methods for the diagnosis of CHIKV. IgM is the first detected antibodies during 4 to 6 days after onset of symptoms followed by IgG. In Colombia, CHIKV's pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the ROC curves of the IgM assays had significantly lower AUCs than those of the IgG and IgM/IgG assays. These differences in assay performance based on antibody isotype are also observed for other infectious diseases, such as chronic pulmonary aspergillosis ( 18 ) and chikungunya virus ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, the ROC curves of the IgM assays had significantly lower AUCs than those of the IgG and IgM/IgG assays. These differences in assay performance based on antibody isotype are also observed for other infectious diseases, such as chronic pulmonary aspergillosis ( 18 ) and chikungunya virus ( 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In a different study, IgM and IgG antibodies working against CHIKV were evaluated by using a specific ELISA technique in 604 patients. After comparing patients with CHIKV and without CHIKV, a statistical significance was observed for IgG and IgM (p <0.0001) [39].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 91%