SAT0184 Screening for osteoporosis by calcaneus ultrasonography in ankylosing spondylitis

Abstract

clinics at Leeds General Infirmary over a two-week period were included in this observational study. Information recorded on a standard case report form included patient details, injection site, indication for injection and whether patients received a standard or an US-guided injection. Results Overall, 91 patients received 127 soft tissue and intraarticular corticosteroid injections. 17 patients (19%) were referred for an US-guided procedure and these patients received 26 injections (20% of total injections). The sites injected using US were small joints of the hands and feet (8), tendon sheaths (8), shoulder (4), hip (3), wrist (2) and sternoclavicular joint (1). Seven patients referred for US-guided corticosteroid injection (41%) reported a poor response to a previous standard injection. US was used to confirm the local diagnosis in 6 patients (35%) before a guided injection was performed. Conclusion The use of US to guide corticosteroid injections is increasing, especially in patients who have failed to respond to a standard injection. US is particularly useful when clinical diagnosis is uncertain or injection is technically difficult. As US becomes increasingly used in rheumatological practise, more rheumatologists may wish to learn the technique of US-guided injection which will require training. Further work is required to determine whether US-guided corticosteroid injection is of additional benefit to patients. REFERENCES 1 Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Lawson C, et al. The impact of ultrasonography on the diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:S299 2 Cicak N, Matasovic T, Bajraktarevic T. Ultrasonographic guidance of needle placement for shoulder arthrography.