Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1108/s1475-1488(2012)0000015009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAS4: Validation of a Four-Item Measure of Worry and Rumination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Smith et al. (: 123) note with respect to the SAS4, self‐report measures of stress have not been indisputably proven to cause activation of the physiological stress response, and the self‐report mode of psychological measurement is potentially vulnerable to individual biases and defense mechanisms. However, as noted above, the conditions measuring stress using the PSS10 have been shown to be correlated with physiological stress arousal, and the scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure in previous research.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As Smith et al. (: 123) note with respect to the SAS4, self‐report measures of stress have not been indisputably proven to cause activation of the physiological stress response, and the self‐report mode of psychological measurement is potentially vulnerable to individual biases and defense mechanisms. However, as noted above, the conditions measuring stress using the PSS10 have been shown to be correlated with physiological stress arousal, and the scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure in previous research.…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research settings, this valid, reliable, and parsimonious scale will allow additional measures to be incorporated into investigations that might otherwise be excluded due instrument length constraints. (For a discussion of additional benefits of parsimonious scales, see Smith et al., : 122–23. )…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations