2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.15.21257271
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 transmission in K-12 schools in the Vancouver Coastal Health Region: a descriptive epidemiologic study

Abstract: Background: There is an urgent need to assess the role of schools in the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Canada to inform public health measures. We describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in students and staff in the Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) region in the first three months of the 2020/2021 academic year, and examine the extent of transmission in schools. Methods: This descriptive epidemiologic study using contact tracing data included all SARS-CoV-2 cases reported to VCH between September 10 an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in educational settings seems to be a reflection of SARS-CoV-2 transmission at the community level (13,14). A study performed in Canada comparing school-related cases and outbreaks of COVID-19 to those in the general population detected more than seventy school clusters, but the weekly incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the schools was always lower than the incidence in the whole population, and the authors concluded that schools were not a significant driver of SARS-CoV-2 transmission (15), mainly when compared to households (16). Additionally, a recent study suggests that children in the age-group of 0-9 years do not have substantial rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection during school attendance and are unlikely to play a substantial role in the spread of the infection (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in educational settings seems to be a reflection of SARS-CoV-2 transmission at the community level (13,14). A study performed in Canada comparing school-related cases and outbreaks of COVID-19 to those in the general population detected more than seventy school clusters, but the weekly incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the schools was always lower than the incidence in the whole population, and the authors concluded that schools were not a significant driver of SARS-CoV-2 transmission (15), mainly when compared to households (16). Additionally, a recent study suggests that children in the age-group of 0-9 years do not have substantial rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection during school attendance and are unlikely to play a substantial role in the spread of the infection (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of secondary SARS-CoV-2 transmission within schools has been heavily debated. On one hand, viral culture studies suggest that children may be less infectious than adults 2 , contact tracing studies show low rates of in-school transmission [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] , and surveillance studies demonstrate little increased transmission when schools re-opened [14][15][16][17][18][19] . On the other hand, seroprevalence studies have been conducted to account for asymptomatic transmission, but many studies have reported data early in the pandemic, or in the setting of partial school closure 15,[20][21][22] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are also in keeping with other seroprevalence and contact tracing studies conducted in BC school settings that showed low rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. [15][16][17][18][19] We demonstrated a higher seropositivity among infants and young adults compared with schoolaged children. Our findings contrast with other cohorts in which seropositivity has been reported.…”
Section: Anti-s Igg Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted August 18, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.13.23294036 doi: medRxiv preprint Enrollment for each phase was based on five, 5-year age brackets (0-4, 5-9, 10-14, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. There was a target sample size of 500 participants per 5-year age group, per phase; each phase was completed when target sample size was reached.…”
Section: (Which Was Not Certified By Peer Review)mentioning
confidence: 99%