2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2022.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in healthcare workers and risk factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed association of smoking with decreased seropositivity was strong, stable across timepoints and subgroups, persistent when adjusted for potential confounding factors, and underscored by a dose–response association. The observed association with odds ratios around 0.5 were similarly observed in previously published seroprevalence studies of different designs [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Altogether, this supports a genuine relationship between smoking and lower seropositivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed association of smoking with decreased seropositivity was strong, stable across timepoints and subgroups, persistent when adjusted for potential confounding factors, and underscored by a dose–response association. The observed association with odds ratios around 0.5 were similarly observed in previously published seroprevalence studies of different designs [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Altogether, this supports a genuine relationship between smoking and lower seropositivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…SARS-CoV-2 antibodies measured in serum of population-based studies’ participants provide insights into the proportion of individuals who have experienced infection. SARS-CoV-2 infection-mediated seroprevalence has been reported to be increased for medical personnel and decreased for smokers in numerous studies [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ], including two studies from Germany [ 11 , 12 ] as well as our baseline (BL) assessment of the Tirschenreuth Study (TiKoCo) [ 13 ]. With the exception of [ 12 ], these results were based on cross-sectional data collected shortly after the first pandemic wave (summer 2020) or in fall 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, otro estudio demostró que podrían interferir en alcanzar una inmunidad robusta a escala poblacional 17,23 . Se evidenció una frecuencia mayor de seropositivos en participantes con síntomas y dependiente del número de síntomas, resultados acordes a lo obtenido en diferentes trabajos ya publicados por otros autores, en los cuales se demostró que estas variables fueron estadísticamente asociadas a la seropositividad [24][25][26] . Así también, ya se ha reportado la asociación de síntomas específicos como ageusia, anosmia y disnea con la seropositividad en otros estudios realizados en países de Europa, en concordancia con nuestros resultados, donde observamos una frecuencia estadísticamente mayor de seropositivos en participantes con estos síntomas [27][28][29] .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified