2022
DOI: 10.3201/eid2810.220494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 Secondary Attack Rates in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Household Contacts during Replacement of Delta with Omicron Variant, Spain

Abstract: T he mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 that began at the end of 2020 reduced COVID-19-related mortality and severity in countries where substantial vaccine coverage was achieved (1,2). The vaccines also had a protective effect against the most recent variants (3,4). However, expectations that vaccines would stop community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through herd immunity were quickly dampened by the early observation of infection and re-infection among vaccinated persons; waning vaccine effectiveness against … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high SAR observed in our study is consistent with the increase in rates observed in the pandemic over time and with the emergence of new variants. López-Muñoz et al [ 15 ], for their household contact study, estimated 58.2% SAR and 80.9% SAR for periods dominated by the Delta and Omicron variants, respectively. Madewell et al [ 14 ], in an update of their systematic review of household SAR, estimated 42.7% SAR (95% CI: 35.4%, 50.4%) for periods dominated by the Omicron variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high SAR observed in our study is consistent with the increase in rates observed in the pandemic over time and with the emergence of new variants. López-Muñoz et al [ 15 ], for their household contact study, estimated 58.2% SAR and 80.9% SAR for periods dominated by the Delta and Omicron variants, respectively. Madewell et al [ 14 ], in an update of their systematic review of household SAR, estimated 42.7% SAR (95% CI: 35.4%, 50.4%) for periods dominated by the Omicron variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a direct comparison between variants is difficult, as vaccination levels and social restrictions varied, SAR estimates by Madewell et al [ 14 ] for the Omicron (42.7%), Alpha (36.4%), and Delta (29.7%) variants were higher than the overall SAR of 18.9% previously reported for the earlier pandemic phase when the wild-type variant was prevalent. Transmission levels have been reported to be higher in households than in other community settings due to exposure intensity and multiple opportunities for transmission [ 9 , 16 ] and due to reduced use of protective measures such as face masks by vaccinated household contacts [ 15 ]. Most protocols still recommend home confinement for people infected with SARS-CoV-2 to reduce transmission in community settings, so studies of household transmission and control measures will continue to be a priority [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a measure of transmission probability per contact, SAR was always treated as an average characteristic across the whole case population or contact settings [ 24 , 38 , 39 ]. We fitted the contact tracing data to the beta-binomial distribution, assuming SAR to be a random variable following a beta distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited duration of protective immunity against infection and the high genomic variability of the pathogen increase the rate of repeated infection 5,6 and extend the persistence of coronavirus over time 7 . This is especially evident with recent variants like Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) and their sub-variants (BA.04 and BA.05) 8 . This new scenario may likely evolve towards an endemic disease, possibly controlled by weather conditions 9 that will cause outbreaks or seasonal peaks similar to most common respiratory infections 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%