2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00069-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 incidence, transmission, and reinfection in a rural and an urban setting: results of the PHIRST-C cohort study, South Africa, 2020–21

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

16
99
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
16
99
6
Order By: Relevance
“…HCIR was also higher when contacts were aged 13-17 and 18-34, compared to younger than 5 years. Contacts aged 13-18 years were also associated with higher HCIR in the South African PHIRST-C study,[2] although studies from earlier in the pandemic showed higher attack rates in elderly household members. [19, 21] This may be related to the shift in age-distribution of cases from the older population to younger individuals with progression of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…HCIR was also higher when contacts were aged 13-17 and 18-34, compared to younger than 5 years. Contacts aged 13-18 years were also associated with higher HCIR in the South African PHIRST-C study,[2] although studies from earlier in the pandemic showed higher attack rates in elderly household members. [19, 21] This may be related to the shift in age-distribution of cases from the older population to younger individuals with progression of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At end of January 2022, South Africa had reported 3.6 million coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and 94.3 thousand deaths; the highest reported from Africa, likely due to the highest testing capacity. [1, 2] South Africa experienced four severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) waves of infection: the first dominated by ancestral variants, followed by Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant dominated waves, respectively. [3]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 , 2 In The Lancet Infectious Diseases , Cheryl Cohen and colleagues explore the nuances involved in SARS-CoV-2 household transmission. 3 Current evidence supports transmission between household contacts as a substantial driver of SARS-CoV-2 spread. 4 , 5 Increased transmission in household settings is likely to be due to non-use of personal protective equipment and close prolonged contact during daily activities within the household.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The prospective household cohort study of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus community burden, transmission dynamics, and viral interaction in South Africa (PHIRST-C) by Cohen and colleagues comprehensively investigated the incidence, reinfection, and transmission dynamics within urban and rural households in South Africa. 3 Novel study methodology included intensive symptom screening, midturbinate nasal swabs twice a week for testing of SARS-CoV-2 with real-time RT-PCR (RT-rtPCR; irrespective of symptoms), and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing every 2 months. The study period coincided with three COVID-19 waves in South Africa, which were driven by original wild-type variant in the first wave, the beta variant in the second wave, and the delta variant in the third wave.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%