SARS-CoV-2 in Exhaled Aerosol Particles from COVID-19 Cases and Its Association to Household Transmission

Abstract

Background Covid-19 transmission via exhaled aerosol particles has been considered an important route for the spread of infection, especially during super-spreading events involving loud talking or singing. However, no study has previously linked measurements of viral aerosol emissions to transmission rates. Methods During Feb-Mar 2021, covid-19 cases that were close to symptom onset were visited with a mobile laboratory for collection of exhaled aerosol particles during breathing, talking and singing, respectively, and of nasopharyngeal and saliva samples. Aerosol samples were collected using a BioSpot-VIVAS and a NIOSH bc-251 two-stage cyclone, and all samples were analyzed by RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. We compared transmission rates between households with aerosol-positive and aerosol-negative index cases. Results SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in at least one aerosol sample from 19 of 38 (50%) included cases. The odds ratio of finding positive aerosol samples decreased with each day from symptom onset (OR 0.55, 95CI 0.30-1.0, p=0.049). The highest number of positive aerosol samples were from singing, 16 (42%), followed by talking, 11 (30%), and the least from breathing, 3 (8%). Index cases were identified for 13 households with 31 exposed contacts. Higher transmission rates were observed in households with aerosol-positive index cases, 10/16 infected (63%), compared to households with aerosol-negative index cases, 4/15 infected (27%) (Chi-square test, p=0.045). Conclusions Covid-19 cases were more likely to exhale SARS-CoV-2-containing aerosol particles close to symptom onset and during singing or talking as compared to breathing. This study supports that individuals with SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled aerosols are more likely to transmit covid-19.

Long distance airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: rapid systematic review

“… 1 46 47 48 These results are in line with experimental and modelling studies that have reported on singing and aerosol generation, suggesting that more virus-containing respiratory particles tend to be emitted when singing compared with speaking or breathing. 53 58 More generally, the quantity of respiratory particles emitted increases with loudness of vocalisation, 59 60 which was thought to have contributed to long distance aerosol transmission in a fitness facility. 42 …”

Exhaled SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral load kinetics measured by facemask sampling associates with household transmission

“…In a cohort of participants sampled within six days of symptom onset or less, using a mobile laboratory that drove to peoples' homes, Alsved and colleagues found that exhaled SARS-CoV-2 RNA had similar findings, but again, due to logistical constraints, only sampled at one point in time. [22] In contrast, Marks and colleagues found that URTS VL was a strong driver of transmission in 314 patients and 753 of their contacts. [23] Since both FMS and URTS VL are from the respiratory tract, both may be related to transmission, but in differing strengths of association.…”

Exhaled breath SARS-CoV-2 shedding patterns across variants of concern

“…First, CT values are a poor measure of the concentration of infectious virus (Puhach et al n.d.). Second, COVID-19 is mostly aerosol transmitted (Greenhalgh et al 2021;Tang et al 2021) and viral shedding patterns differ between respiratory compartments (Chen et al 2021b;Alsved et al 2022). Third, vaccination and natural infection are difficult to account for (Feikin et al 2022).…”