2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 host tropism: An in silico analysis of the main cellular factors

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the first study to be reported, where 16 different mammalian species were categorized for susceptibility to infection based on the structural molecular interactions and the presence of active glycosylation sites in the ACE2 receptor. Our study correlates well with a previously reported study where cats and ferrets are reported as highly susceptible compared to dogs, pigs and mice (Rangel et al 2020 ) . However, the study reported by Shen et al (Shen et al 2020 ) described both cats and dogs are prone to infection than other species in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is the first study to be reported, where 16 different mammalian species were categorized for susceptibility to infection based on the structural molecular interactions and the presence of active glycosylation sites in the ACE2 receptor. Our study correlates well with a previously reported study where cats and ferrets are reported as highly susceptible compared to dogs, pigs and mice (Rangel et al 2020 ) . However, the study reported by Shen et al (Shen et al 2020 ) described both cats and dogs are prone to infection than other species in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We and others [16][17][18] have postulated that structural variation in different species of ACE2 might determine S protein binding and thereby determine which species are permissive to SARS-CoV-2 infection 19 . For example, the low binding affinity of S protein for mouse ACE2 likely explains why mice are not susceptible to SARS-CoV2 infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained results indicated that the mutations that occurred in the RBD of the Omicron variant resulted in an increased number of interactions between the spike and ACE2 receptor, especially, the number of interactions associated with the charged residues was increased (Table 2). Importantly, it has been previously described that the interactions between the charged residues of the viral spike and the host ACE2 play a major role in the complex stabilization and host selectivity [7,18,19]. These changes in the number and type of interactions were reflected in a decreased binding free energy (Table 2) and a decrease in the electrostatic, van der Waals interactions, and desolvation energies with an overall lower haddock score obtained for the Omicron variant as compared to the WT variant (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%