2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcosine in Prostate Cancer Tissue is Not a Differential Metabolite for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness and Biochemical Progression

Abstract: Sarcosine in prostate cancer tissue samples cannot be considered a suitable predictor of tumor aggressiveness or biochemical recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
59
2
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Moreover, although urinary sarcosine concentrations were higher among prostate cancer cases than in controls in one 14 but not in another validation study, 16 high sarcosine concentration was associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness when measured in prostatic tissue, 15 and with prostate cancer recurrence when measured in serum at prostatectomy. 17 Although the above mentioned observations were based on relatively small and selected study populations, we investigated the role of sarcosine prospectively in a large population-based nested case-control study.…”
Section: Sarcosine and Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 82%
“…13 Moreover, although urinary sarcosine concentrations were higher among prostate cancer cases than in controls in one 14 but not in another validation study, 16 high sarcosine concentration was associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness when measured in prostatic tissue, 15 and with prostate cancer recurrence when measured in serum at prostatectomy. 17 Although the above mentioned observations were based on relatively small and selected study populations, we investigated the role of sarcosine prospectively in a large population-based nested case-control study.…”
Section: Sarcosine and Prostate Cancermentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Since sarcosine was originally shown to be a mechanistic biomarker of aggressive prostate cancer, there has been critical discussion in the literature regarding the clinical utility of this metabolite. Most studies have demonstrated that post-DRE urine sarcosine measurements are predictive of prostate cancer [11][12][13]; however, the findings in serum and tissue are more controversial [14][15][16][17]. As Issaq and Veenstra [18] pointed out, the results of these studies may not be directly comparable due to methodologic differences in sarcosine measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their conclusion was similar to that of Jentzmik et al [7] that ''serum sarcosine is not a marker for prostate cancer''. Later on Jentzmik et al [12] published another study measuring the levels of sarcosine by GC/MS in matched malignant and non-malignant tissue samples from 92 patients with prostate cancer. Again they concluded that prostate cancer tissue levels of sarcosine do not differ from nonmalignant tissue, obviating the use of this metabolite as a biomarker for prostate cancer aggressiveness and biochemical progression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%